@ffesti ping
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1547#issuecomment-874223347___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
828096679886cab4d428e1481a5c8f30bd23a7c1 Avoid undefined shifts
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
I wholeheartedly agree, which is why I would be perfectly with you requiring
that a compiler support `-fwrapv -fwrapv-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` :smile:.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view
Yeah, I've ran into this as well, on more than one occasion. Rant alert...
:warning:
Here's what C99 standard says of it:
> The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated bits
> are filled with zeros. If E1 has an unsigned type, the value of
> the result
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
9c36c3fcb1ece6857788e5de05cf08a6203881f0 Avoid undefined shifts
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
