Closed #119.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/119#event-964848963___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@Redfoxmoon3 OpenSSL support has now been merged into rpm git master with
commit 64028f9a1c25ada8ffc7a48775f526600edcbf85.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I just opened PR #129
Reviews and concerns are most welcome.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
The licensing situation is solvable:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#What.27s_the_deal_with_the_OpenSSL_license.3F
Short version: In Fedora, the legal team has come to the determination that the
usage is within the spirit of the licenses, if not its specific
The problem is licensing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/119#issuecomment-271224042___
Rpm-maint mailing list
I believe @sgallagher from the Fedora Modularity group also was interested in
this...
Snippet from `#rpm.org` conversation back in October requesting it:
```
[Monday, October 17, 2016] [12:54:05 PM EDT] ffesti: I know this is
going to be a controversial question, but how hard would it be to
