Closed #92.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/92#event-796940680___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
Some configuration files are executables and so they require the
signature in the extended attribute. If they are not executable,
they can be skipped.
Examples for configuration files that are also executables are
the grub files in /etc/grub.d.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
We want to prevent that the IMA plugin applies signatures of the older
version of files. So we have to check whether we are in the install
(TR_ADDED) or remove (TR_REMOVED) cycle of a package. We only apply
signatures in the install cycle.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger
Stefan Berger wrote on 09/21/2016 02:04:08
PM:
> From: Stefan Berger
> To: rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
> Cc: fionnuala.gun...@gmail.com, stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
> zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
> Date:
The following series of patches addresses some issues with signatures on
files. In particular:
- some files marked as config files are also executables and therefore
need to have a signature applied
- the IMA plugin may only run on package install cycle rather than the
remove cycle, which
On 09/21/2016 09:14 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
Stefan Berger wrote on 09/21/2016 02:04:08
PM:
From: Stefan Berger
To: rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
Cc: fionnuala.gun...@gmail.com, stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Stefan
On 09/21/2016 10:21 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 09/21/2016 09:14 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
Stefan Berger wrote on 09/21/2016 02:04:08
PM:
From: Stefan Berger
To: rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
Cc: fionnuala.gun...@gmail.com,