Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %attr license files by default (#1090)
Should be done as a part of #567. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1090#issuecomment-606054657___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] find-debuginfo.sh: cpio looking into wrong path (#322)
Ok, still easily reproducable by commenting out this: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/timeshift/blob/master/f/timeshift.spec#_71 Whether there's anything rpm can actually do about this I dunno. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/322#issuecomment-605993643___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h and fcntl.h compatibility mess from system.h (#1146)
Looks good -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146#issuecomment-605953855___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add an ArchiveX header (#372)
This is a valid use case. But I dislike the idea of adding a new tag for this. I'd rather like to see something that is closer to the hack without its drawbacks `Source1: https://foo.bar/baz -> ba-1.2.tgz` or `Source1: https://foo.bar/baz : ba-1.2.tgz` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/372#issuecomment-605953186___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python bindings are using system RPM instead of in-source one (#130)
Right, that's a fair point. Ultimately there should indeed be just one way to build the bindings, maintaining multiple ways was never a good idea anyway. OTOH calling setup.py from inside automake sounds like a nightmare too. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/130#issuecomment-605952790___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python bindings are using system RPM instead of in-source one (#130)
Without the setup.py, we don't have the egg-info data which other projects use to depend on the Python bindings. The Autofoo should probably just be reworked to call setup.py instead. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/130#issuecomment-605949977___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: macro for checking endianess (#365)
Needs to be looked at when re-doing the architecture handling. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/365#issuecomment-605946854___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python bindings are using system RPM instead of in-source one (#130)
The issue here is pretty convoluted: the setup.py method of building was originally added primarily to support shipping python-bindings as a separate tarball, to support building multiple versions of the bindings. The former never happened, and to support Py 2 vs 3 people have been building the bindings in-tree with the setup.py method, which never really really worked. Now that that Python 2 is no longer supported at all, I think the solution to this is either axe the setup.py method entirely, or make it error-out if trying to build in-tree. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/130#issuecomment-605944390___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Decouple build, host, and target platforms to enable cross-compiling RPM and RPMs (#103)
This needs to be reviewed in the context of the architecture redesign whenever that happens. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/103#issuecomment-605925518___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: read sources checksums from the SPEC file and verify them (#463)
Unfortunately, the minimalistic solution is used for something else already: URL fragments are used to have a different file name from what a download from the URL would normally yield, e.g. if an on-the-fly generated upstream archive doesn't contain the package name. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/463#issuecomment-605923682___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h and fcntl.h compatibility mess from system.h (#1146)
Added similar cleanup for fcntl.h, and rebased to fix conflict from the vfs-cleanup. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146#issuecomment-605877061___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h compatibility mess from system.h (#1146)
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit. 6ac1880a100c8ab4cf532f5959bf84fe2af9dfdb Flush 1998 vintage fcntl-compatibility mess from system.h -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146/files/e6d89e45f910210b0397ed9c6a848eafe17c78c8..6ac1880a100c8ab4cf532f5959bf84fe2af9dfdb ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h compatibility mess from system.h (#1146)
Added a missed dirent.h in fts.c (now there's another pile of ... to clean up) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146#issuecomment-605866634___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h compatibility mess from system.h (#1146)
dirent.h and struct dirent are actually standard on this millenium, the only thing that isnt is d_type member for which we have and retain a specific test in configure.ac. Include dirent.h where needed, relatively few places do which makes it even a bigger insult to have this included from system.h. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146 -- Commit Summary -- * Flush 1998 vintage dirent.h compatibility mess from system.h -- File Changes -- M lib/backend/ndb/rpmpkg.c (1) M lib/backend/ndb/rpmxdb.c (1) M lib/rpmdb.c (1) M rpmio/rpmglob.c (5) M rpmio/rpmio.c (1) M system.h (17) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1146 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Flush 20+ year old statfs() jungle, always use standard statvfs() (#1143)
Merged #1143 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1143#event-3177469691___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix phrasing & package one more man page (#1145)
Thanks for the patches and having a close look at the alpha! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145#issuecomment-605848969___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix phrasing & package one more man page (#1145)
Merged #1145 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145#event-3177397915___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix phrasing & package one more man page (#1145)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145 -- Commit Summary -- * fix phrasing * also package rpm-plugins.8 -- File Changes -- M doc/Makefile.am (1) M doc/rpm-plugin-prioreset.8 (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1145 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] actually include the new man pages (#1144)
@pmatilai approved this pull request. Doh! Thanks :slightly_smiling_face: -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144#pullrequestreview-383606226___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] actually include the new man pages (#1144)
Merged #1144 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144#event-3177329018___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] actually include the new man pages (#1144)
https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.16.0 says Add man pages for all plugins and rpm2archive (#1016) However RPM 4.16.0 alpha doesnt actually include them… Ahem This pull request actually includes the new man pages the tarball and thus the vendor rpms… :-) Thanks You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144 -- Commit Summary -- * actually include the new man pages -- File Changes -- M doc/Makefile.am (5) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1144 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
