Also rpm's own fontconfig.prov is broken:
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/updates_testing/20200624045432.daviddavid.duvel.28729/log/plasma-desktop-5.19.2-1.mga8/build.0.20200624045513.log
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 10:47, Panu Matilainen a
écrit :
>
> This fixes multiple dependency generator related regressions introduced
> beta2, by reverting the "fail build on dependency generator failure"
> change introduced there.
>
> We don't usually release new tarballs just because an issue
Seems that something in mock environment trips up the new GPG_TTY related
warning, causing (a bogus) test-suite failure due to the extra output:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pmatilai/rpm-snapshot/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01499743-rpm/build.log.gz
```
--- /dev/null 2020-06-24
Oh my. Thanks for sharing, I'll check that.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1290#issuecomment-648804803___
No worries, it's not the first (or last) time mock trips up something because
it's a rather special environment.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Le mar. 23 juin 2020 à 14:41, Panu Matilainen a
écrit :
>
> Some fairly important fixes cropped up in the last few weeks so we
> decided to go with a second beta for a change. The highlights since
> beta1 include:
>
> - fix hardlink breakage on upgrade when minimize_writes is enabled
> - fix
On 6/24/20 9:30 AM, soig wrote:
> Also rpm's own fontconfig.prov is broken:
> http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/updates_testing/20200624045432.daviddavid.duvel.28729/log/plasma-desktop-5.19.2-1.mga8/build.0.20200624045513.log
>
Adding:
+ printf("mname='%s', cmd='%s' (callable=%d)\n", mname, cmd, callable);
Shows the following:
grep _font RES1 -1
mname='__elf_provides', cmd='/usr/lib/rpm/elfdeps --provides ' (callable=0)
mname='__font_provides', cmd=' ' (callable=0)
mname='__gobjectintrospection_provides',
Reverts the broken dependency generator failure commit. Beta2 was released to
address that sort of annoyances with beta1 and introducing new ones goes
against the spirit of having a trouble-free beta experience.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
Actually with beta3, I can reproduce it locally:
$ LC_ALL=C rm -fr BUILD/rpm-4.16.0-beta3/
(…)
rm: cannot remove
'BUILD/rpm-4.16.0-beta3/tests/testing/data/SPECS/test-subpackages-pathpostfixes.spec':
Permission denied
rm: cannot remove
Yup, and there's more: every caller of rpmfcExec() does so with slightly
different expectations of what will happen in what situations, and
rpmfcHelper() was doing +1 on errors whereas the lower layers were returning -1
and ... whatnot. It needs a *careful* review on reapproach.
--
You are
Closed #1283.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1283#event-3476168453___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Nah, it deserves to be reverted because it can't be fixed by any one little
thing, it's broken in more ways than we have tickets for and we have two
already. It really needs a restart from scratch.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
This fixes multiple dependency generator related regressions introduced
beta2, by reverting the "fail build on dependency generator failure"
change introduced there.
We don't usually release new tarballs just because an issue was found in
a beta, but since beta2 was released to address
rpm's own fontconfig.prov is broken:
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/updates_testing/20200624045432.daviddavid.duvel.28729/log/plasma-desktop-5.19.2-1.mga8/build.0.20200624045513.log
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 08:38, Panu Matilainen a
écrit :
> On 6/24/20 9:30 AM, soig wrote:
> > Also rpm's own fontconfig.prov is broken:
> >
>
On 6/23/20 5:16 PM, rpm-maint wrote:
> Architecture is hardcoded in test and thus it fails on anything not x86_64
> :-(
>
> See
> http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20200623135516.tv.duvel.30441/log/rpm-4.16.0-0.beta2.1.mga8/build.0.20200623135605.log
>
> --- -
This is simply too broken to patch up. Revert and back to drawing board.
This reverts commit fb5299b2a49460216c38674b7398296d3a6d767c.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1286
-- Commit Summary --
* Revert
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 10:59, Thierry Vignaud a
écrit :
>
> This fixes multiple dependency generator related regressions introduced
>> beta2, by reverting the "fail build on dependency generator failure"
>> change introduced there.
>>
>> We don't usually release new tarballs just because an
Beta2 was fine besides "rpmbuild.at:482 Dependency generation 3 build":
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/done/cauldron/core/release/20200623145307.tv.duvel.658/rpm-4.16.0-0.beta2.1.mga8/
But beta3 introduces a new failure. See build*.log files & look for "Summary of
the failures" at:
I think we should keep it for master and revert fo 4.16
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #1288.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1288#event-3476574212___
Rpm-maint mailing list
See http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2020-June/80.html, you
managed to grab the wrong tarball.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Ex:
$ sudo mv /usr/lib/rpm/fileattrs/font.attr{,.no}
$ LC_ALL=C rpmbuild --short-circuit --define "_topdir $PWD" -ba
SPECS/feh.spec
(…)
Wrote: /home/tv/mga/pkgs/feh/RPMS/x86_64/feh-3.4.1-1.mga8.x86_64.rpm
Wrote:
/home/tv/mga/pkgs/feh/RPMS/x86_64/feh-debugsource-3.4.1-1.mga8.x86_64.rpm
Wrote:
Nobody noticed the test-results being x86_64-specific due to buildroot
path getting exposed, what a dumb cause... Override the default buildroot
definition to make it arch-independent for these cases.
Fixes: fb5299b2a49460216c38674b7398296d3a6d767c
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull
Reopening as the fix was reverted (it was just too broken to live)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Reopened #1183.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1183#event-3476265711___
Rpm-maint mailing list
This one is still not fixed in 4.16.0 beta3 AFAIK…
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
It is because the problematic test doesn't even exist anymore. But if you were
really hasty, you might've downloaded the wrong tarball (when things go wrong,
they really do...), check that you have one with sha256sum
e6196fac6adcc13ca39699627a1cfc99c79c0beb9acca8c4d065b6cc9d50471c (as per
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 11:02, Thierry Vignaud a
écrit :
>
>> This fixes multiple dependency generator related regressions introduced
>>> beta2, by reverting the "fail build on dependency generator failure"
>>> change introduced there.
>>>
>>> We don't usually release new tarballs just because an
For references, here's the fallout:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1285
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Right, there are ... issues with the error code handling in rpmfcExec().
For now, it's best to just revert the "always fail" commit
fb5299b2a49460216c38674b7398296d3a6d767c, it's just broken.
Thanks for the report.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Merged #1287 into rpm-4.16.x.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1287#event-3476314408___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closed #1285.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1285#event-3476588512___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Fixed in master and beta3, thanks again for reporting.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Architecture is hardcoded in test and thus it fails on anything not x86_64 :-(
See
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20200623135516.tv.duvel.30441/log/rpm-4.16.0-0.beta2.1.mga8/build.0.20200623135605.log
--- - 2020-06-23 13:59:13.826080861 +
+++
Merged #1286 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1286#event-3476208995___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Since beta2 introducing parallel mode, some files are not removable.
See build*.log at
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/uploads/failure/cauldron/core/release/20200623141813.tv.duvel.19852/log/rpm-4.16.0-0.beta2.1.mga8/
(…)
Wrote:
Closed #1284.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1284#event-3476583293___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
Maybe a slow mirror somewhere in there. Try again until you get the right
version.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Indeed we can close this one.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1289 is the only
remaining issue with beta3
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Is this good to be merged?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1272#issuecomment-649113390___
Rpm-maint mailing list
42 matches
Mail list logo
