Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)

2020-07-10 Thread lgtm-com[bot]
This pull request **introduces 1 alert** when merging 
ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581 into 
16d9074e1a3020f8844ed4a213fb92e844d8f9ad - [view on 
LGTM.com](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/rpm-software-management/rpm/rev/pr-c82bc2501b0f2dd9d33aa330ec1e1449275633a3)

**new alerts:**

* 1 for Modification of dictionary returned by locals\(\)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309#issuecomment-656793037___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit.

ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581  Improved python support: enums are 
now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using 
CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/41310c6ffda99386b1e7f8354ebb542ffc310317..ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311

-- Commit Summary --

  * Added a high-level wrapper.

-- File Changes --

A python/rpm/highLevel.py (38)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311.patch
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support threading for zstd compression. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread Igor Raits
@ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.



>AS_IF([test "$enable_zstd" = "yes"], [
 if test "$have_zstd" = "no"; then
   AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-zstd specified, but not available])
 fi
   ])
+  PKG_CHECK_MODULES([ZSTD], [libzstd], [have_zstd=yes], [have_zstd=no])

I think it is much easier to have here `libzstd >= 1.3.8` rather than custom C 
preproc check.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#pullrequestreview-446554479___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)

2020-07-10 Thread Michael Schroeder
I guess it can't deal with the ECDSA and EdDSA signatures.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-656772125___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Size check is too strict (#1232)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Double checking the code the unchanged files should not be counted when 
`%_minimize_writes` is enabled. So it obviously isn't in this test case.

The question here is why the installation with `--ignoresize` passes without an 
error. I wonder if there is some trickery going on on the FS level to not 
actually using all those blocks filled with zeros. From an rpm POV this should 
not work and rpm is expected to actually use twice as much space unless 
`%_minimize_writes` is enabled.

Not sure if this is really worth further exploring...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1232#issuecomment-656739157___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Please that `rpmbuild -ba` includes `-br + -bb`, not `-bs + -bb` (#1304)

2020-07-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
> My guess is you want that rpmbuild man page is more clear

Yes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1304#issuecomment-656737122___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH
Thank you.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310#issuecomment-656726988___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
The ticket system is not a help forum. Please ask questions like this on 
#rpm.org @freenode or on the mailing lists. See http://rpm.org/community.html 
for details.
To the question at hand: There is an rpm.archive class. An instances can be 
obtained from an rpm.files object with the .archive() method. Some 
documentation on these classes can be found with `pydoc rpm`.
But to my knowledge this code has rarely been used - if ever. So there may be 
dragons... (like hard links - or worse)

Unless you have good reason consider using rpm2archive or rpm2cpio.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310#issuecomment-656714319___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Closed #1310.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310#event-3534208073___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Question: multi-threaded zstd compression (#1300)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
As there now is a pull request (#1303) I am closing this ticket here. No need 
to distribute the discussion to multiple places.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1300#issuecomment-656708268___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Question: multi-threaded zstd compression (#1300)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Closed #1300.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1300#event-3534156801___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH
Supporting signatures (being able to read and process them) and non breaking in 
their presence, by just ignoring them, are very different things.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-656706547___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Please that `rpmbuild -ba` includes `-br + -bb`, not `-bs + -bb` (#1304)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Sorry, I am not quite understanding what you are suggesting here. My guess is 
you want that rpmbuild man page is more clear?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1304#issuecomment-656706082___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Can not parse CHANGELOGTEXT from the specfile (#1301)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Looking at the code I understand why this may go wrong but I have not yet found 
why it worked before and what changed.

 `rpm --specfile` is translated to `rpmspec -q`with popt aliases. By default 
rpmspec queries all generated sub packages. So I am kinda confused by you only 
get one line. Can you try `rpm -q --qf "%{NAME} %{CHANGELOGTEXT}\n" --specfile 
"docpkg.spec"
`, please?

Also as CHANGELOGTEXT is an string array the correct usage would be 

`rpm -q --qf "[%{CHANGELOGTEXT}\n]" --specfile "docpkg.spec"`

but that still doesn't explain why this worked before.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1301#issuecomment-656703883___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Yes, this is a known - or not so well known - limitation. As the signature 
check is basically done by hand it lack a lot of feature one would expect of 
GPG proper.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-656698903___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support threading for zstd compression. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread marxin
> This change looks good and straight forward.

Thanks!

> 
> I am missing some information on what version of zstd supports the new API - 
> and if necessary a check in configure.ac.

Updated `configure.ac` (one needs at least release `1.3.8`).



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#issuecomment-656696346___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Treat /usr/share/gnome/help as docs (#1295)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #1295 into master.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1295#event-3534052702___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Treat /usr/share/gnome/help as docs (#1295)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Let's hope that rpmlint is right...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1295#issuecomment-656695500___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix python(abi) requires generator, it picked files from almost good directories (#1272)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
I don't see any need for further discussion here.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1272#issuecomment-656689650___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix python(abi) requires generator, it picked files from almost good directories (#1272)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #1272 into master.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1272#event-3534004891___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix Doxygen comments (#1302)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Thanks for the fix!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1302#issuecomment-656686843___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix Doxygen comments (#1302)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #1302 into master.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1302#event-3533981732___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Adapt Python version marker workaround for setuptools 42+ (#1308)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Looks straight forward to me.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308#issuecomment-656685900___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Adapt Python version marker workaround for setuptools 42+ (#1308)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #1308 into master.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308#event-3533973211___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support threading for zstd compression. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread Florian Festi
This change looks good and straight forward.

I am missing some information on what version of zstd supports the new API - 
and if necessary a check in configure.ac.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#issuecomment-656683723___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)

2020-07-10 Thread lgtm-com[bot]
This pull request **introduces 1 alert** when merging 
41310c6ffda99386b1e7f8354ebb542ffc310317 into 
ae163b56468e5e83cbba192dab02ebdb9cf3df5d - [view on 
LGTM.com](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/rpm-software-management/rpm/rev/pr-ada2169273c889f9f6fe1cafe2bcc19672203382)

**new alerts:**

* 1 for Modification of dictionary returned by locals\(\)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309#issuecomment-656681753___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)

2020-07-10 Thread KOLANICH
Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix 
stripped.

```python
import rpm
print(rpm.RPMBuild.CHECK | rpm.RPMBuild.CLEAN) # RPMBuild.CLEAN|CHECK: 
24
print(rpm.RPMBuild(24)) # RPMBuild.CLEAN|CHECK: 24
```
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309

-- Commit Summary --

  * Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. 
Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix 
stripped.

-- File Changes --

M python/rpm/__init__.py (2)
A python/rpm/rpmEnum.py (77)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309.patch
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Adapt Python version marker workaround for setuptools 42+ (#1308)

2020-07-10 Thread torsava
Looks good to me!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308#issuecomment-656673366___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps.py: Adapt Python version marker workaround for setuptools 42+ (#1308)

2020-07-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853597#c11

pkg_resources from setuptools 42+ no longer only use platform.python_version(),
but also platform.python_version_tuple() -- this was updated in packaging 19.1+.

This fix makes it work again with both new and old setuptools,
hopefully for some while.

https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/commit/bf069fe9ddcadaa2c029067601d06a07d037d4f7
https://github.com/pypa/packaging/commit/86a443f3185024edd0b826afdd91d8f9a4917022
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308

-- Commit Summary --

  * pythondistdeps.py: Adapt Python version marker workaround for setuptools 42+

-- File Changes --

M scripts/pythondistdeps.py (1)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308.patch
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1308
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Support threading for zstd compression. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread marxin
@marxin pushed 1 commit.

1d965759205bf5f072724c397004ba1a433f7c7f  Support threading for zstd 
compression.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303/files/fff307dd41294192560a33cca09e3675a0af925a..1d965759205bf5f072724c397004ba1a433f7c7f
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] zstd compression: port to the new API. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread marxin
@marxin pushed 1 commit.

fff307dd41294192560a33cca09e3675a0af925a  Support threading for zstd 
compression.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303/files/fec86dfc33a67ce75c0113b64d0ec4fede975eab..fff307dd41294192560a33cca09e3675a0af925a
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add %postbuild section / Allow dynamic sub packages (#1239)

2020-07-10 Thread nim-nim
My understanding of the feature is that it will eventually require some 
mecanism to reconciliate the subpackage metadata (that the feature directly 
targets in the new section) and srpm metadata.

Because without such a mechanism, you’ll be asking packagers to be extra 
careful to never put everything in main, that collides with what you generate 
in postbuild, and you have the *huge* backwards compatibility and upgrade path 
problem, of all the existing packages where srpm metadata = only subpackage 
metadata.

Plus, asking packagers to check manually things that could be automated, is 
plain dumb and the opposite of what the feature is trying to achieve.

As soon as you add a reconciliation mechanism between main and something 
executed after %build, you make the srpm as it exists before %build provisional 
on the reconciliation that happens after %build.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1239#issuecomment-656602237___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add %postbuild section / Allow dynamic sub packages (#1239)

2020-07-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Is this contribution ever meant to modify the built source RPM content?
I.e. can `%postbuild` be (mis-)used so that `rpmbuild -ba` and `rpmbuild -br`
both generate a different variant of source RPM?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1239#issuecomment-656589656___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] zstd compression: port to the new API. (#1303)

2020-07-10 Thread marxin
So the answer is that it's stable and reproducible.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#issuecomment-656525918___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint