Closed #1319.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1319#event-3653848372___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Le mer. 24 juin 2020 à 10:47, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
>
>
> This fixes multiple dependency generator related regressions introduced
> beta2, by reverting the "fail build on dependency generator failure"
> change introduced there.
>
> We don't usually release new tarballs just because an issue
Thank you, and sorry for wrong bug report.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1331#issuecomment-673523429___
Closed #1331.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1331#event-3652419234___
Rpm-maint mailing list
`%{VERSION}` is replaced within the spec file itself. You need to use
`%%{VERSION}` to avoid expanding the macro right away.
As you already said this is probably a really bad idea anyway. RPM actually
does backup modified config files on it's own if they are tagged as config
files in the
I need to backup some conf files of my package during upgrade into directory
called e.g `/mypackage-`.
So I'm trying to get old package version in `%pre` scriplet and doing it in the
following way:
```
%pre
VERS=$(rpm --queryformat='%{VERSION}' -q mypackage)
VERS_ALTERNATIVE=$(rpm -qi mypackage
Merged #1330 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1330#event-3652177653___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Various proprietary packages in the wild have subtly malformed data
in the signature header, in particular wrt the immutable region size,
presumably from using some in-house/3rd party signing tools which do
not understand the immutable region business at all. This can prevent
resigning and
I agree --exportdb should work on read-only fs. Unprivileged user is a
different matter, we can't really let unprivileged user to block system updates
through ro-locking.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Like said, rpm has some support for packaging policies BUT nothing inside or
outside rpm actually uses that data. So for all practical purposes, rpm has no
special support for packaging policies, hence the Fedora style packaging.
The partial support is a leftover from attempted policy support,
The only meaningful reference I could find on packaging policies is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux_Independent_Policy
Looking at memcached, the policy file is simply packaged as a sub-package of
the actual package
podman fails for me but I will try some `make check` in some VM next time; I
did not want to spend time fixing local check:
`* "localhost/fedora:32": Error initializing source
docker://localhost/fedora:32: error pinging docker registry localhost: Get
"https://localhost/v2/": x509: certificate
Just FYI, you can run the CI locally (podman required) with: `make ci`
Also it's okay to submit a work-in-progress PR that is not for merging yet,
just add BLOCKED label to it, that tells others not to bother with it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply
Closed #1329.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1329#event-3650665257___
Rpm-maint mailing list
In other words, it simply means that rpm doesn't actually *do* anything with
it. The only thing rpm does with SELinux is that on install, it queries the
system policy for correct file contexts.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
15 matches
Mail list logo