Merged #1358 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358#event-3744967705___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Merged #1347 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1347#event-3744961445___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Been thinking about this on and off. I'm totally convinced that we should
record the dependency architecture, rather than the existing super dumb
()64bit() marker thing. I'm just far less convinced that the architecture
should be embedded in each and every dependency string we store.
If we
Merged #1355 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1355#event-3744887478___
Rpm-maint mailing list
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358
-- Commit Summary --
* Couple of trivial and obvious const-correctness fixes to build code
* Handful of trivial and obvious const-correctness fixes to librpm code
--