> @DemiMarie thank you! What version of lua? I had 5.2.0 and it told me it
> wasn't recent enough. Should I try a more recent one (which one?)
You need 5.4.0, IIRC. 5.3.0 might work.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Yup, this sounds like papering over some issue in either local setup or
something else, and I don't think we should do that.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I'm not sure what you mean by that. At least with the openssl-backend, whatever
system policy is set is already honored - including FIPS, which in fact does
cause v3 (and pre 4.14 built packages too) to fail to install. People are
running into this quite a bit in RHEL 8.
--
You are receiving
Containers aside, I'm still now sure why the `TMPDIR` variable would be set to
anything other than a directory?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
No no, Lua 5.2 is the oldest supported version, as it says in INSTALL and
configure.ac. On some distros (eg Debian and derivates) lua.pc is versioned and
our configure.ac wont find it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Lotsa new names, many from translations but otherwise too.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1582
-- Commit Summary --
* Update credits for a change
-- File Changes --
M .mailmap (2)
M CREDITS (45)
@weblate pushed 2 commits.
ba9951856153d5e707e24986c66255633d852a4c Translated using Weblate (Finnish)
fcae845b3b2f38a78b729e5b3c8d64fe745fa6a4 Translated using Weblate (Korean)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -24,10 +53,12 @@ If you want to change whether or not an option is enabled
> by default, only
change `%bcond_with` to `%bcond_without` or vice versa. In such a case, the
remainder of the spec file can be left unchanged.
+
Seems like stray
Could it be an issue with not finding lua.pc? I was looking at this post, and
that seems to be important:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47458678/why-lua-5-3-can-not-find-the-path-of-include-missing-lua-include-dir
I've been trying all morning to get this to work with various variables
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -76,47 +76,25 @@
%defined() %{expand:%%{?%{1}:1}%%{!?%{1}:0}}
%undefined() %{expand:%%{?%{1}:0}%%{!?%{1}:1}}
-# Shorthand for %{defined with_...}
+# Handle conditional builds.
+# (see 'conditionalbuilds' in the manual)
+#
+# Internally,
@DemiMarie pushed 1 commit.
a1b3a4582307786ed9e737d7945d1d6fe2a98c50 Enable hardening flags where available
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
Sorry, this has gotten a bit forgotten in middle of other action.
The idea is nice, certainly. Just some minor nitpicks, plus rebase and squash
the "doc nit" commit.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
By using GCC’s overflow-checking builtins, we avoid needing to reason
about overflow manually, which is error-prone. Having GCC do the
arithmetic in infinite signed precision is much nicer.
This was assigned CVE-2021-20249, which is why I am making this PR.
You can view, comment on, or merge
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -990,3 +990,25 @@ xxx
error: bad
])
AT_CLEANUP
+
+AT_SETUP([bcond macro])
+AT_KEYWORDS([macros])
+AT_CHECK([
Move this test into the other one in rpmbuild.at - the macro tests are more
about testing the macro language and its builtins. There
Is there a patch we can use [maybe
here](http://lua-users.org/wiki/LuaPowerPatches) to patch our lua install to
have this file?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Ok, I found a patch to generate lua.pc, added to PKG_CONFIG_PATH, and it starts
the build, but then errors out:
```
==> Error: ProcessError: Command exited with status 2:
'make' '-j8'
23 errors found in build log:
1023mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Po
1024libtool: link:
okay I think I'm beyond that error - now I have:
```
==> Error: ProcessError: Command exited with status 2:
'make' '-j8'
16 errors found in build log:
1024mv -f .deps/libcliutils_la-cliutils.Tpo
.deps/libcliutils_la-cliutils.Plo
1025depbase=`echo tools/hashtab.o | sed
They were removed here
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/376fef14a61a9748ce004888fe19445719a5d2d5#diff-c9a9cfdfa5b80aab803ef1466d35d0b6ef4d7435b2663cd789e50493ace95857.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view
These functions have been deprecated but the debugedit library is not updated?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/635edd95230e17e8ada5793719d7e385e729df30/rpmio/rpmlua.h
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
Okay so I went back and used this older version, and installed binutils to get
the first set of missing symbols, and now I have this:
```
>> 1071
/home/vanessa/Desktop/Code/spack-dev/opt/spack/linux-ubuntu20.04-skylake/gcc-9.3.0/binutils-2.36.1-rwurk7323mkmtj2gcqzb2frviciev3eu/bin/
20 matches
Mail list logo
