Re: [Rpm-maint] Porting RPM to Sequoia PGP

2021-11-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/1/21 17:37, Justus Winter wrote: Panu Matilainen writes: On 11/1/21 14:07, Justus Winter wrote: Neal Gompa writes: On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:17 AM Justus Winter wrote: Panu Matilainen writes:

Re: [Rpm-maint] Porting RPM to Sequoia PGP

2021-11-03 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > My point is the following. If RPM relies on policies enforced by the > underlying crypto libraries, such as FIPS, and there is no additional > mechanism in RPM, then RPM is unfortunately not following best practices > when it comes

Re: [Rpm-maint] Porting RPM to Sequoia PGP

2021-11-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/3/21 14:33, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 11/3/21 14:26, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 11/1/21 17:37, Justus Winter wrote: [...] But, not every individual program decides to incorporate an OpenPGP implementation.  Most defer this kind of policy to some library that takes care of sunsetting