Re: [Rpm-maint] rpm packages with empty files..

2008-01-14 Thread Pazzo Da Legare
Dear Mark, thank you again for your explanation, I will have a look at the sources, pazzodalegare 2008/1/11, Mark Hatle [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There is a bit that is set by the rpm package that controls various aspects of validation. md5sum, attributes, size, ghost (if it may or may not

[Rpm-maint] compiling rpm support

2008-01-14 Thread Pazzo Da Legare
Dear all, I would like to build rpm and all dependencies from source, version 4.4.2.x Could you please indicate which are the minimal requirements to build the library? I would like to understand what operations one 'loose' building the library without the openssl/libcrypto, Thank you for your

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-14 Thread Lennert Buytenhek
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@) The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building and using VFP-optimised RPM packages for ARM

[Rpm-maint] Re: [PATCH,RFC] arm: add support for VFP architectures

2008-01-14 Thread Mark Hatle
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:01:46AM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: (please CC on replies, I'm not on rpm-maint@) The attached patch adds a 'v' near the end of the machine name if the (ARM) system we're running on supports VFP. This allows building and using VFP-optimised