Patch:
http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/rpm/0005--Cleanup-removing-unnecessary-repeated-code.patch
--
rakesh
From 4c5f5b80beb924de58a2481e6529f8272bbe35a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rakesh Pandit rak...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:50:35 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] - Cleanup:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Is tryReadHeader a good name ?
- Move header reading part from rpminstall to tryReadHeader function.
Patch:
http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/rpm/0001--Move-header-reading-part-from-rpminstall-to-tryRea.patch
*Patch also involves removal of -#include
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Is checkFreshenStatus apt enough ?
- Moved code to check possibility of freshen operation to
checkFreshenStatus.
Patch:
http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/rpm/0002--Moved-code-to-check-possibility-of-freshen-operati.patch
Looks fine to me, just an
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/3/13 Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pan...@gmail.com:
Just that I had been looking at usage of rpmgi in query.c did some cleanup.
Sorry posted the old one ... latest one:
Patch:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
I will factoring rpmgi.c specially rpmgiNext a bit and ripping not
used parts. Aim being to ease it enough so that progress about
Conflict Updating thingy, Callback methods , manifest fixs can be
made at later stage.
- Removed unnecessary
When an rpm is upgraded is the existing package removed before or after
the post section of the package that is replacing it?
I ask because in my %post of a package a symlink gets created. This
symlink is also removed if the package is removed so in the %postun
If i install the rpm the
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 08:06:41AM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
New packages files installed
Old package files removed (ones not already overwritten by the install)
postun run
post run
Not really. The order is:
prein new
install files from new
postin new
preun old
delete
Please take a look at the following snippet from RHEL5's
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros file:
#=
=
=
=
=
=
# configure macros. note that most of these are inherited
# from the defaults.
#
%_prefix/usr
I had sent the following mail to rpm-l...@lists.rpm.org, but haven't
received a response. Perhaps rpm-maint is a more appropriate forum for
my queries.
Hi all,
I'm not a regular rpm builder, but have the need to build some at
the moment. I've been successful in building the few rpm's
