Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: experiments with rich dependencies

2014-09-09 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 04:51:12PM +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote: > Hi Panu et al, > > attached is an updated version of my rich dependencies patch. > I cleanup up the code a bit, now we have only one generic parser > instead of three specialized ones, and we use a callback function > to do the n

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.12.0 rc1 released

2014-09-09 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 09/09/2014 03:34 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: On 9 September 2014 12:07, Panu Matilainen wrote: It looks like the following requires is no more emitted: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Note that I care much but is that intended? Sigh, that'd be yet another regression from the dependency re

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.12.0 rc1 released

2014-09-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 9 September 2014 12:07, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> It looks like the following requires is no more emitted: >>rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 >> Note that I care much but is that intended? > > Sigh, that'd be yet another regression from the dependency refactoring > between alpha and beta. Fixe

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.12.0 rc1 released

2014-09-09 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 09/09/2014 12:46 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote: On 27 August 2014 08:44, Panu Matilainen wrote: As usual, the full details & download info are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.12.0 Hi It looks like the following requires is no more emitted: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Note that I c

Re: [Rpm-maint] RPM 4.12.0 rc1 released

2014-09-09 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 27 August 2014 08:44, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > As usual, the full details & download info are at > > http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.12.0 Hi It looks like the following requires is no more emitted: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Note that I care much but is that intended? See you