Closed #50.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/50#event-547469932___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Ok, squashed the last three commits and adjusted the commit message a bit.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/50#issuecomment-182966562___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
Florian,
It should be all nice and fixed up in the GitHub PR. I added an extra
patch on top to resolve getopt related issues, so everything should be
peachy. :)
Thanks for the patch. :)
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Florian Festi wrote:
> I think the different cli flags are not orthogonal e
I think the different cli flags are not orthogonal enough. Here is the
latest version from the PR plus what I think should be done to get a
clean behavior.
Anyone missing anything?
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/ Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht M
Looks like this fell through the cracks back then. I can only guess why.
May be everyone was on vacation...
Anyway this topic came up recently and this looks like the proper
solution. Pushed upstream as 61109446ac67ca8f3d96a5592814561db908d83c
with only very minor corrections as followup patches.
That's not for me to address. SVN doesn't report an error in applying patches
when invoked with the `-q`option. You can invoke `%autosetup` with its `-v`
option to ad 'verbosity'. See also [this
post](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201602.mbox/%3C4451361.UxCNakeCms%40kom
It can be applied also without support for compressed patches but it would be
nice at least to show some error and fail build when somebody will try to use
compressed patches with svn. Now no error is showed an build continues without
applying patches.
---
Reply to this email directly or view i
On 01/26/2016 01:57 PM, tele wrote:
> I can not find in source code where rpmbuild trying open scripts
> ( for example find-requires )
> Where or how I need looking ?
The dependency generator is using file attributes (see fileattrs/ [1]).
The code handling those can be found in build/rpmfc.[hc] [2
Attached is a set of patches to make rpm build cleanly on OS X.
Patches 0001, 0002, 0003 should be pretty straightforward and safe.
Patch 0004 looks like an outright bug. Maybe it works on other
platforms because the rpm packaging of rpm fixes it up somehow.
Patch 0005 is more a hack to get it
I can not find in source code where rpmbuild trying open scripts
( for example find-requires )
Where or how I need looking ?
___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
OK, added the first 3 patches. The later two need to be done in a more
compatible way. I'll have a look on the linked patch for the __progname issue.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/57#issuecomment-182793012___
Closed #57.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/57#event-546952766___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Closed #46.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/46#event-546932390___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Added the fixes. Making the new dependency generator the default is probably
going to be up to the distributions. May be we change the default later on.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/46#issuecomment-182787312
14 matches
Mail list logo