Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: show command which is executed for dependency generator in debug mode (#338)

As someone who regularly hacks on dependency generators, this would absolutely be valuable for me! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM shows warning about including file twice when using %doc (#336)

Working on this is not in my plans. But then (too) much of my work isn't exactly planned... See the "Merge duplicate entries" code for the things that need comparing, figure out the right thing to do for each: - if it can be meaningfully handled, just do so - if it looks like a packaging bug,

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] error in the docs (at rpm.org): exclamation mark is missing (#339)

When reading , an exclamation mark is missing: There are also provisions for including text if flag was present using “%{-f:X}”. This macro expands to (the expansion of) X if the flag was present. The negative form, “%{-f:Y}”, expanding to (the

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFC Merge RPM 4.13 OS/2 code changes (#260)

OS/2 is currently mantained and developed by ArcaNoae LLC, they released ArcaOS 5.0 and many updates to drivers and applications: https://www.arcanoae.com/tag/arcaos/ Also a lot of work has been done in porting open source applications http://trac.netlabs.org/rpm http://trac.netlabs.org/ports

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM shows warning about including file twice when using %doc (#336)

@pmatilai I think that would work in my case (I mean your proposal about non-default-vs-default values). Are you going to implement it yourself or should I? Is it only about comparing uids, filemodes and so or there are some other worms inside? -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: show command which is executed for dependency generator in debug mode (#338)

On 23 October 2017 at 15:33, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Currently I don't see way how to debug rpm dependency generators.. > Something just happens silently and might be broken in some way and there > is no way of finding out what's going on. > > — > You are receiving this

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM shows warning about including file twice when using %doc (#336)

This is quite a common pattern in packaging where you have a package owned "top" directory and then you'd want that *one* (or two...) file/directory inside that to differ from the defaults. Whether for file ownership / permission bits or virtual attributes. Not specific to %doc or %license at

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] build/files: don't produce warning if file marked as %doc is already … (#337)

Closed #337. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/337#event-1307109128___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] build/files: don't produce warning if file marked as %doc is already … (#337)

NAK, this only makes %license and %doc special in ways that they are not, and the issue more generic than just flags. Lets discuss it in #336. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: