Re: [Rpm-maint] RFC: SUSE/openSUSE's proposed relocation of /var/lib/rpm
[/me moves to center of thread, pulls out defibrillation machine, *zzzt* *zzzt*] On Thu, Oct 26, 2017, at 04:59 AM, Richard Brown wrote: > > As we're pressed on time, openSUSE will be going right ahead and moving it's > rpmdb to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm as > fast as possible I assume this was done? > Meanwhile I plan to take all of the points that have bubbled up as part of > this conversation and present them > to Debian/yum/dnf/PackageKit/Arch to try and get them onboard with the idea > in the hope that we can start > coalescing a cohesive solution around this idea Before we move on to other packaging ecosystems, a useful next step to me seems to be teaching various libs (librpm, libsolv, libdnf) to look in this location first. Maybe something like supporting %dbpath as a list in librpm? Or maybe have it be empty by default, and if it's unset that means "find automatically"? ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)
Closed #270. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/270#event-1363134715___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)
Anyway... the check disabled for the signature header in commit 34c2ba3c6a80a778cdf2e42a9193b3264e08e1b3, thanks for the patience everybody. There will be an update to 4.14.x sooner than later, this will be included. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/270#issuecomment-347805304___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fail to check signature (#270)
Oh okay, took a dog-walk for it to register: in rpm5 RPMSIGTAG_PADDING is used for the actual padding between the signature and main header, which is different from rpm.org's RPMSIGTAG_RESERVEDSPACE. From the initial description of #183 I assumed it was essentially the same and, I admit, didn't bother with the other details you provided later. So it's different, in a number of ways, my bad for assuming otherwise. But in that case, calling headerReload() again after adding the padding tag seems wrong, it's just that the second call doesn't actually seem to do much anything so it ends up being harmless. This is true of rpm.org's headerReload() as well BTW - it only works once to actually pull it all into that single contiguous region. I seem to recall running into that once or twice but never got around to look into it just then, there hasn't been much of a reason to bother. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/270#issuecomment-347795350___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
