Also with would not work here, but or would.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/639#issuecomment-468954919___
Rpm
Yrs, nbconvert, edited. I don't think conflicts would be good, does the version
equivalency work for e.g. 5.4.1? I'd need to check how != works in this case
with pip.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https:/
Now I finally remember why I opened
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/376
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/639#issuecomment-468941912__
@hroncok How would we translate `'nbconvert!=5.4'`?
Would we go with `Requires: (python3.7dist(nbconvert) < 5.4 with
python3.7dist(nbconvert) > 5.4)`?
Or would we enable Conflicts generation and translate this into the following?
```specfile
Requires: python3.7dist(nbconvert)
Conflicts: python3
@hroncok You mean `nbconvert`? I see `python3.7dist(nbformat)` in there...?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/639#issuecomment-468941437_
@pavlinamv #625 was merged, so could you rebase this on top of current git
master?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/613#issuecomment-468939640___
