Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Compress annobin notes (#751)

2019-06-14 Thread Colin Walters
Can you keep the commit message title to < 80 chars? And move the text from the PR description into the commit message as well. Seems OK to me but: why don't the compilers do this by default? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Compress annobin notes (#751)

2019-06-14 Thread nickclifton
This is a request to add support for compressing annobin notes found in executable binaries built on Fedora and RHEL systems. The annobin project adds a note section to binary files describing the security hardening features of how they were built. Unfortunately these notes can get quite

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Take changelog timezone in account (RhBug 1715412) (#739)

2019-06-14 Thread pavlinamv
pavlinamv commented on this pull request. > @@ -178,13 +179,17 @@ static int dateToTimet(const char * datestr, time_t * > secs, int * date_words) if (*secs == -1) goto exit; +if (tzname[1][0] == 0) + rpmlog(RPMLOG_WARNING, _("bogus TZ database name in %%changelog: %s\n"),

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %buildarch does not reflect architecture of current %package declaration (#689)

2019-06-14 Thread Panu Matilainen
Reopening for further discussion / reconsideration: It turns out that Fedora is widely depending on %{buildarch} macro being set to detect noarch sub-packages for at least Python packages. Relying on %{buildarch} is essentially broken as noted above, but it does work for noarch sub-packages.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] %buildarch does not reflect architecture of current %package declaration (#689)

2019-06-14 Thread Panu Matilainen
Reopened #689. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/689#event-2413246658___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to enforce rpm install and upgrade to fail if rpm is not signed (#750)

2019-06-14 Thread Ambika Prasad Tripathy
Which option i have to use to enforce install to fail if rpm is not signed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: