[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Ability to have a file in %files via a command (macro) evaluated at buildtime (#894)
I'd like to have a macro, that sees the files after `%install` is finished and
can do stuff with the files in `%buildroot` and `$PWD`, and I like to use the
macro in the `%files` section.
Minimal (not so useful) example with a command:
This works:
```
%files
%(echo /foo)
```
This doesn't:
```
%build
echo /foo > ./special_file
...
%files
%(cat ./special_file)
```
I know that the above could be achieved via `%files -f special_file`, but
imagine the macro I want to put in there is not simply catting a file, but
doing some logic.
Currently, the usual workflow is:
1. get the command/macro output a file
2. use that file in `-f`
```
%{our_files} > special_file
%files -f special_file
```
However I want to avoid this step and be able to use:
```
%files
%{our_files}
```
What's needed to make this happen?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/894___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Oh, and thanks for reporting too. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540585783___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Avoid using types from Lua includes in rpmlua.h again (#893)
Merged #893 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893#event-2702742763___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Avoid using types from Lua includes in rpmlua.h again (#893)
As per https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540578117... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893#issuecomment-540584461___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Excellent. Thanks for testing and confirming. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540584119___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Closed #888. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#event-2702699440___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Thanks, it really fixes this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540578117___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Store built binary rpms info in source rpm (#642)
There's now a potential implementation in #891 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/642#issuecomment-540553839___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Should be fixed by #893 (doesn't help with the pkgconfig module name though) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540534280___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms (#891)
Hmm. Provides for autocreated sub-packages could be flagged with RPMSENSE_FIND_PROVIDES to differentiate from manual ones. This would be quite similar to how other spec parsed items behave (eg if you query the spec, you'll only see manual dependencies, you need a full build to get autogenerated deps) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891#issuecomment-540529010___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms (#891)
That's a fair point, certainly. It would only be possible to populate those when binaries were produced as a part of the build as well. Only adding the provides on actual builds was something I did consider for this, but landed on parse-time as that seems quite useful on its own. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891#issuecomment-540528157___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Avoid using types from Lua includes in rpmlua.h again (#893)
rpmlua.h was originally written in a way that allows it to be included regardless of whether Lua is actually enabled in rpm or not, or where Lua headers are, specifically to isolate the rest of rpm from these details. That was changed in commit 62bd62286aa888c60145daf315a938dd87eadc89 when lauxlib.h started getting included in rpmlua.h, which leaks to places like librpmbuild which do not directly use Lua. The way Lua typedefs the luaL_Reg struct to itself defies my C fu for for handling this in some nicer typesafe way, fix this all by just using a void pointer instead, this is just an internal API where buyer can be expected to beware. Fixes #888 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893 -- Commit Summary -- * Avoid using types from Lua includes in rpmlua.h again -- File Changes -- M lib/rpmliblua.c (1) M rpmio/rpmlua.c (3) M rpmio/rpmlua.h (8) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/893 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms (#891)
I'm curious how this would work against @ffesti's idea about dynamic subpackages. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891#issuecomment-540509041___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't insert rpmlib() dependencies for dynamic buildrequires (#878)
Oh, we can't design rpm features based on what's available via the flawed repodata format. Really. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/878#issuecomment-540508364___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Oh, *now* I see the problem: commit 62bd62286aa888c60145daf315a938dd87eadc89 added the lauxlib.h include to the rpmlua.h header which used to be independent of lua headers, and thus gets included from places where LUA_CFLAGS are not enabled. Will fix. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540507558___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't insert rpmlib() dependencies for dynamic buildrequires (#878)
Ok, so finally I have some free time. So the requerements were that you should be able to easily (by having just rpm metadata, aka primary.xml) do following: * Whether SRPM uses DynamicBuildRequires feature * Whether SRPM has DynamicBuildRequires inserted into it -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/878#issuecomment-540507375___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Always execute file trigger scriptlet callbacks with owning header (#892)
This is part II of commit 6d610e9b9a906548ce44265d7f36199441ea8bca which missed one but common case where the element with matches gets passed to the callback instead of the owning one, as pointed out in RhBug:1724779. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/892 -- Commit Summary -- * Always execute file trigger scriptlet callbacks with owning header -- File Changes -- M lib/rpmtriggers.c (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/892.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/892.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/892 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms (#891)
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit. 120e980fb65b32e6d3a4dba83770770cfabc6941 Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891/files/480fe0d5756693290f51d7f4721f25ce2ffc46ee..120e980fb65b32e6d3a4dba83770770cfabc6941 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms (#891)
Since requires in source rpms are buildrequires, with the same logic provides in source rpms are buildprovides, and what does a build provide if its not the names of the packages to be generated. This seems like a natural fit, should be useful for various purposes, and eliminates the need for a special rpmspecQuery() with RPMQV_SPECBUILTRPMS to get that information. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891 -- Commit Summary -- * Add NEVR provides for all packages that would be built into source rpms -- File Changes -- M build/parseSpec.c (11) M tests/data/SPECS/foo.spec (13) M tests/rpmspec.at (16) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/891 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
