@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
I acked this on the Fedora side, so here's the same ack on the upstream side. 😄
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1
This would essentially make it so rpm can behave the same way dpkg does, and
opens us to the same problems dpkg has:
* People can and will randomly manipulate files to force the package manager to
do weird things (it's even documented in various troubleshooting guides)
* It is not possible to at
> I tend to be of the opinion that this is to be expected, you need to define
> values before you can use it,
> But all this does raise questions about the allegedly free order of spec tags
> (and sections). Clearly it never was entirely free due to side-effects such
> as the above, but it for m
The change break specs that relied on early Source definition to workaround the
unbounded behaviour of `%description`
* SourceX then (sub)package headers →
```
error: Bad source:
/var/lib/builder/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{name}/dejavu-fonts-version_2_37.tar.gz: No
such file or directory
```
`%
