[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix Doxygen comments (#1302)

2020-07-07 Thread Narek Galstyan
Some of code documentation comments are misformed which causes corresponding doxygen docs not to be generated. I found out about this because I was looking the the [online docs](http://ftp.rpm.org/api/4.15.1/group__header.html#ga33376e8850c275b72059fe723a0d3066) for a function I knew existed

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Can not parse CHANGELOGTEXT from the specfile (#1301)

2020-07-07 Thread Ondrej Nosek
Hi, recently unit tests for `rpkg` tool started failing. I found, that `rpm` returns a different result than before. I have simple specfile: ``` Summary: Dummy summary Name: docpkg Version: 1.2 Release: 2%{dist} License: GPL #Source0: #Patch0: Group: Applications/Productivity BuildRoot: %(mktemp

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "rpmbuild -br" returns 11 even if "--nodeps" is used (#963)

2020-07-07 Thread Michal Domonkos
Well, that's a good point. Reopening and rewording the title to implement a man page update. Thank you, Pavel! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "rpmbuild -br" returns 11 even if "--nodeps" is used (#963)

2020-07-07 Thread Michal Domonkos
Reopened #963. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/963#event-3520900913___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "rpmbuild -br" returns 11 even if "--nodeps" is used (#963)

2020-07-07 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Shouldn't we at least document somewhere what the exit status 11 means then? Ie why we are returning that value? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "rpmbuild -br" returns 11 even if "--nodeps" is used (#963)

2020-07-07 Thread Michal Domonkos
As discussed with @ffesti on IRC today, we'd rather keep this behavior as is, although a point can be made both ways, i.e. in favor of the exit code 11 with `--nodeps` (to signal *unchecked* dynamic deps) as well as in favor of a different exit code (since deps weren't checked per user's

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] "rpmbuild -br" returns 11 even if "--nodeps" is used (#963)

2020-07-07 Thread Michal Domonkos
Closed #963. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/963#event-3520109680___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add %postbuild section / Allow dynamic sub packages (#1239)

2020-07-07 Thread nim-nim
That being said, the PR is a nice step in the right direction. It’s just that its design has limits, and will probably not scale once you start mixing spec generators with different ideas of where the dynamism should start or end. With a single section at a single point of the spec generators

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add %postbuild section / Allow dynamic sub packages (#1239)

2020-07-07 Thread nim-nim
> %postbuild is misleading and dangerous. You need a dynamic starting point for > every section that succeeds %post, More generally, the problem you are attempting to solve, is not the lack or not of a new rpm section, and the shredding or not of the existing spec file. Those are all fuzzy

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Question: multi-threaded zstd compression (#1300)

2020-07-07 Thread marxin
The answer is that threads are not supported right now. Adding the author of the port (@n3npq), he may be interested in? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: