This is definitely something we want to fix in Python in the future. The
biggest problem here is that marshal (the format used internally for
byte-compiled cache files) has to be very fast and every step towards
reproducibility has an impact of its speed. Moreover, I don't know if anybody
excep
Closed #1185.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1185#event-3604860188___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.r
So I did some more testing and it turns out, after all, that rpmbuild only
spends a tiny fraction of time in the `processPackageFiles()` function;
dependency generators (kmod.prov in particular) are a much bigger bottleneck
but also vastly trickier to parallelize.
The speed improvements that I
@marxin pushed 1 commit.
34a78ee61a67a9ffe11142c045fd1fa01e44160e Enable thread autodetection for a
parallel compression.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1324/files/cd31048911a1d3c6094e
It's a follow up of #1303, so adding @ignatenkobrain as a reviewer ;)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1324#issuecomment-666359866
When using xz or zstd, it can be handy to automatically detect
number of threads. We can use `%{getncpus}` for that.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1324
-- Commit Summary --
* Enable thread autodetection for
Merged #1318 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1318#event-3603597053___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Closed #963 via 28b3704034a9c772959485a130b918f414da9796.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/963#event-3603597156_
Thanks for all the work and polishing!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1318#issuecomment-666335786___
Rpm-maint m
Closed #1304 via aa5bcb0a4e05667d8298cc008f6d9ee876681dde.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1304#event-3603597138___
@ffesti approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1318#pullrequestreview-458353180___
Rpm-m
Thanks for the patch!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1320#issuecomment-666329463___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-m
Merged #1320 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1320#event-3603542624___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
In general I am not a fan of hiding issues this way and would prefer such
issues would be found and fixed. Otoh we are so far away from Python upstream
that this may just be the pragmatic thing to do.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email direc
Sorry, this took a bit longer than it should have, Thanks for your work and
patience!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#issuecomment-666324374___
Merged #1303 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1303#event-3603495856___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
CI seems happy now, can please anybody merge it? I've got another patch based
on this one that I would like to propose..
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/130
17 matches
Mail list logo
