Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] elfdeps: Add full multiarch deps support (#1038)
Been thinking about this on and off. I'm totally convinced that we should record the dependency architecture, rather than the existing super dumb ()64bit() marker thing. I'm just far less convinced that the architecture should be embedded in each and every dependency string we store. If we store the extracted dependency strings as-is, and associate the arch via a separate indexed arch table there are several benefits available: - The dependency strings are identical across architectures, making data compress better and making comparisons and queries saner, dependency on zlib is always "libz.so.1" and not some associated mumble - As the extracted dependency architectures are stored as an array of their own, we gain a kind of an automatic RPMTAG_ARCH replacement that is an array consisting of all the architectures this package depends on/provides something for. A "normal" package would of course only have one arch in there, but it might open up interesting possibilities to handle this generally. - Constructing dep(marker) style strings out of these arrays is easy if needed for eg repodata (in the short term) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1038#issuecomment-689471380___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Some obvious/trivial const-correctness fixes (#1358)
Merged #1358 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358#event-3744967705___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Upgrade FA_TOUCH to FA_CREATE if the file went away (RhBug:1872141) (#1347)
Merged #1347 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1347#event-3744961445___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Disable SSD auto-detection, mark %_minimize_writes as experimental (#1355)
Merged #1355 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1355#event-3744887478___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Some obvious/trivial const-correctness fixes (#1358)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358 -- Commit Summary -- * Couple of trivial and obvious const-correctness fixes to build code * Handful of trivial and obvious const-correctness fixes to librpm code -- File Changes -- M build/files.c (5) M build/parsePrep.c (3) M lib/headerfmt.c (2) M lib/rpmds.c (2) M lib/rpmrc.c (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1358 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint