[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] build/pack.c: build failure due to pragma omp task untied on codesourcery-mips toolchain (#1420)

2020-11-03 Thread Fabrice Fontaine
We have the following build failure on buildroot with rpm 1.16.0 and codesourcery-mips toolchain (https://sourcery.mentor.com/public/gnu_toolchain/mips-linux-gnu/mips-2016.05-8-mips-linux-gnu-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2): ``` pack.c: In function 'packageBinaries': pack.c:769:26: error: expected

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] pythondistdeps: Switch to importlib.metadata (#1317)

2020-11-03 Thread lgtm-com[bot]
This pull request **fixes 1 alert** when merging 1eeb6b66e2933881f78a7d870bab3f2ee29bf216 into 98b71f7a92e8e9d902e2bfcd6c30af84dd80289b - [view on LGTM.com](https://lgtm.com/projects/g/rpm-software-management/rpm/rev/pr-88d3a1c4115318fb2c38b78151955c51b3357bbd) **fixed alerts:** * 1 for

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add preliminary support for dynamic built-in macro registration (#1406)

2020-11-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
Rebased on top of the recent macro changes. It should be possible to bring the builtins still closer to regular macros, but there are some peculiar cases like `%{verbose:...}` and `%{load:...}` which have their own semantics for `?` and `!`. -- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add preliminary support for dynamic built-in macro registration (#1406)

2020-11-03 Thread Panu Matilainen
Also it's tempting to make %{lua:...} only defined at all when lua support is built in, but that means losing the very clear error message about missing lua support when trying to use it. Whether that actually matters to anybody at all, I dunno... -- You are receiving this because you are