[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild logging tweaks (#1429)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1429 -- Commit Summary -- * Add each macro for concise log queue iteration * Extract log iteration from rpmlogPrint() * Print only errors in rpmbuild summary (#793) -- File Changes -- M build/build.c (2) M rpmio/rpmlog.c (36) M rpmio/rpmlog.h (7) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1429.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1429.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1429 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate special conditional syntaxes from builtin macros (#1421)
> Yup, we've actually been pondering about making Lua mandatory. I would definitely be in favor with making Lua mandatory. In practice, _everyone_ already builds RPM with Lua support because it's needed for handling RPMs for systems in general... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1421#issuecomment-724152331___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate special conditional syntaxes from builtin macros (#1421)
Yup, we've actually been pondering about making Lua mandatory. Also note that this was just for the macro part, actual package scriptlets are still guarded with both rpmlib() dependency and execution time error message. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1421#issuecomment-723993690___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate special conditional syntaxes from builtin macros (#1421)
I'm not super happy about the lua change, but I guess everybody builds rpm with lua support enabled so that the missing error generation will not matter much. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1421#issuecomment-723977595___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Only do early name services initialization if we actually chroot (#1427)
Merged #1427 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1427#event-3973395614___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate special conditional syntaxes from builtin macros (#1421)
Seems like folks wont be missing these too much... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1421#issuecomment-723969381___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate special conditional syntaxes from builtin macros (#1421)
Merged #1421 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1421#event-3973391142___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate use of obsolete gethostbyname() function (#1428)
@pmatilai pushed 1 commit. b16e255e1b99cc248067d94e9023b7d2486ff674 Eliminate use of obsolete gethostbyname() function -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1428/files/a7c70d3454919b11e75f15b66387824011519377..b16e255e1b99cc248067d94e9023b7d2486ff674 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Eliminate use of obsolete gethostbyname() function (#1428)
We only actually used gethostbyname() for canonicalizing buildhost, convert that to use getaddrinfo() instead: this is not a particularly useful or interesting field so just grab whatever result comes first. The other use was to initialize name services, but as we dont need or use hostnames for any operation, we can just as well drop it. User and group names are what we care about. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1428 -- Commit Summary -- * Eliminate use of obsolete gethostbyname() function -- File Changes -- M build/build.c (20) M configure.ac (2) M lib/rpmug.c (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1428.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1428.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1428 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Simplify & unhackify dependency generator command construction (#1424)
Merged #1424 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1424#event-3972233687___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add and use rstrndup() API for duplicating partial strings (#1425)
Merged #1425 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1425#event-3972226566___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Only do early name services initialization if we actually chroot (#1427)
Theres no point or need to do all this fluff on library initialization, we can just as well do it when were told to use a chroot by calling rpmChrootSet(), at which time were still on familiar ground. Eliminating unused cruft from initialization cant hurt our start-up times either. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1427 -- Commit Summary -- * Only do early name services initialization if we actually chroot -- File Changes -- M lib/rpmchroot.c (5) M lib/rpmrc.c (5) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1427.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1427.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1427 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm --whatrequires does not resolve provides (#1426)
Thanks! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1426#issuecomment-723808513___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm --whatrequires does not resolve provides (#1426)
``` --whatrequires CAPABILITY Query all packages that require CAPABILITY for proper functioning. ``` It's literally as it says, it only looks for packages that require the queried *capability*. This is expected behavior and not a bug, although resolving the capability would be a nice option to have. In the meantime, `rpm -e --test` can be used as a workaround. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1426#issuecomment-723796924___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm --whatrequires does not resolve provides (#1426)
Closed #1426. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1426#event-3972071687___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
