@dmnks pushed 2 commits.
6fbfcfe7bb1dce6ce926602d6bc5800150c17994 Add rpmlogGetNrecsByMask() function
a520b3fabbb744163cb9cad2441976e001549ec8 Add summary
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pul
@dmnks pushed 6 commits.
1c332a1cfd24ce98c0a765f93ac3d45c819df376 Add rpmlogPrettyPrint() function
09be300f7c97f8959c2ba983af079af413ca6d72 Refactor
2f05222886e6927a97b944d3029eed52a361e8b8 Ensure EOL in last line buffer
44c98a8a0d01e9ba7bfca3a3c986df1165219335 NOEOL
3def2912c3e05662ac1a881333
Merged #1394 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1394#event-4032626671___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1394#pullrequestreview-537445098___
R
Anyway, this is superceded by #1395 and #1394 which I just updated, lets handle
any remaining discussion there, closing.
Thanks for bringing this upstream and helping find a nice resolution.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https
Closed #1393.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1393#event-4031865808___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rp
Update includes:
- testcases added
- a bug in the original version where the (GNU)HASH stuff depended on
executability still
- exeonly removed from elf.attr
- rebased
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://g
Actually this needs dropping the "exeonly" flag from elf.attr too - will
update...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1394#issuecomment-732750607__
Revisiting some older comments here...
Having dependency generation depend on executable bit only makes sense for
those files whose behavior the executable bit actually changes. A library
requires what it requires regardless of its permissions, but a program that
cannot be executed doesn't requ
rubygem- packages exclude cached versions of the .gem package itself (I don't
want people to redistribute these, because they differ from the canonical
packages available on rubygems.org), so every package contains `%exclude
%{gem_cache}`. I don't think this one will be big deal to hide in
`%ge
>From dnf-daemon point of view this plugin looks good and definitely useful.
>I've just build rpm with this plugin enabled and I'm going to test how it
>works. Thanks Florian!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #1443 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1443#event-4030856744___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Out of curiosity, what's the thing that rubygems systematically exclude?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1448#issuecomment-732673881___
I don't see rpm automatically creating such a package, but it's not like you
*have to* ship every package that gets built. Happens in RHEL all the time,
maybe Fedora should support the concept too? For example I could see packaging
up tests being potentially useful for test-automation, but such
Okay, good to hear I wasn't alone loathing it :sweat_smile:
Thanks for the review(s).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1443#issuecomment-732659181___
15 matches
Mail list logo
