Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] unable to import GPG keys if bit 7 "critical" of the subpacket type is set (Issue #2323)

2022-12-12 Thread Ricardo
Hi @DemiMarie , thank you for this quick response. can you confirm that import works in recent versions for this key? ```bash -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GopenPGP 2.4.10 Comment: https://gopenpgp.org xsFNBGOXVycBEAC1WtGnRGw5/X6g3O46sC6gF4CDgdsX6/ny9phr5ptZLZP4pX5q

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] unable to import GPG keys if bit 7 "critical" of the subpacket type is set (Issue #2323)

2022-12-12 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
Please report this to SUSE. RPM 4.14.3 won’t be getting updates from upstream. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2323#issuecomment-1347608828 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] unable to import GPG keys if bit 7 "critical" of the subpacket type is set (Issue #2323)

2022-12-12 Thread Ricardo
Hi, I try to debug an issue we ran into while trying to import GPG keys generate using GO https://github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto The sub package type "Issuer ID" is always set "critical":

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM Query behavior via sudo vs user (Discussion #2322)

2022-12-12 Thread gclair
Thank you! Very helpful! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2322#discussioncomment-4380465 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM Query behavior via sudo vs user (Discussion #2322)

2022-12-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
The regular user doesn't have write-permissions on the shared database environment (those __db.* files), which is required to register even a read-lock in there. So when running as a regular user, rpm cheats by using a private environment, which amounts to no locking at all wrt a concurrent

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Multiple builds via the BuildArch tag do not work (Issue #2319)

2022-12-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
I really don't remember the behavior from those days, no strong opinion here. Other than agreeing on "it seems pretty broken in many places" that is. As for optflags - yes, and BuildArch should arguably also (re)load platform macros while at it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM shows the same Package in two versions / can only be uninstalled once (Issue #2320)

2022-12-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
Oh, that db_recovery stuff is only relevant for Berkeley DB backend, and in upstream configuration. On Suse, the BDB usage differs and you wouldn't see such messages (IIRC). Also 4.14 fell out of upstream support a couple of years ago already. The db_recovery doc needs to be updated though.