Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Don't rely on pkg-config for Lua (PR #2469)

2023-04-08 Thread Neal Gompa
Have we tried advocating to Lua upstream to include a pkgconfig file recently? If not, maybe that's worth doing, and then we can keep relying on pkgconfig. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2469#issuecomment-1501028061 You

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM v6 package format, first public draft for commenting (Discussion #2374)

2023-04-08 Thread Daniel Alley
> except for the rpm magic, the lead will be zeros only I'm curious if we want to apply this even to the "major" file format version number in the lead? Of all the fields, that one seems like it could eventually have some potential use. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM package invariants? (Discussion #2025)

2023-04-08 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
v4 cannot require this because of backwards compatibility. v6 does require it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2025#discussioncomment-5561362 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM package invariants? (Discussion #2025)

2023-04-08 Thread Daniel Alley
> (*) Header tag data entries must be sorted. I'm unclear on what this means, do you mean 1) We cannot require tags to be sorted at parse time for compatibility reasons, or 2) There are certain tags which must be in certain positions in a sort-order violating way? -- Reply to this email