Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Standardize on OCI images for test-suite, even locally (Issue #2643)
@dmnks Next time shout at me about what's missing! I Would have been happy to discuss improvements to mkosi to make it work for your use case. (I would have commented but had no clue you were considering it) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2643#issuecomment-2000416984 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] `define(name, body)` documentation does not align with implementation (Issue #2962)
It's kinda sad that this strips the leading spaces:
```
rpm -E "%{lua:macros.define({'foo', ' 1 '})}" -E "x%{foo}x"
>1 <
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2962#issuecomment-1999675441
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Macro documentation does not mention `{body}` syntax for macro definitions (Issue #2976)
I noticed that there is no documentation for this construct
```
$ rpm --define 'foo { bar }' --eval '>%{foo}<'
> bar <
```
Should we document it? Or is that feature deprecated? Does anybody use it at
all?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2976
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive -f pax cannot handle non-utf8 filenames (Issue #2972)
It's not much work to not use libarchive for writing. The only two formats that can be used for archive writing are cpio and pax (all the others have too many limitations). Writing cpio is easy and writing a pax tar file is also not hard (reading a tar file is where it gets really messy because of all the different implementations). Is that something you would be interested in? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2972#issuecomment-1999363220 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive -f pax cannot handle non-utf8 filenames (Issue #2972)
I find it very surprising that bsdtar's output depends on the current locale, but that seems to be the case: ``` $ echo hello > micro_µ $ bsdtar -cf - . | bsdtar -tf - ./ ./micro_µ $ LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro bsdtar -cf - . | bsdtar -tf - ./ ./micro_µ $ LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro bsdtar --options hdrcharset=BINARY -cf - . | bsdtar -tf - ./ ./micro_µ ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2972#issuecomment-1999298329 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive -f pax cannot handle non-utf8 filenames (Issue #2972)
Btw, it cannot handle UTF8 filenames as well, as it checks the current locale which is not initialized and thus 7 bit ascii... -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2972#issuecomment-1999274523 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive -f pax cannot handle non-utf8 filenames (Issue #2972)
Oh, and the error handling in rpm2archive is completely broken... -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2972#issuecomment-1999270285 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm2archive: fix hardling handling in cpio output (PR #2975)
In the newc cpio format the content of hardlinked files is supposted to be stored with the last hardlink and not the first. Fixes issue #2974 You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2975 -- Commit Summary -- * rpm2archive: fix hardling handling in cpio output -- File Changes -- M tools/rpm2archive.c (10) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2975.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2975.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2975 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2...@github.com ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
