Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)
1. Lua is a terrible choice of a programming language IMHO (at least dealing with encodings in it used to be nightmare, though IDK how is it now). Some embedded JS engine may be better. 2. If to implement something in lua, one can ask why not to implement everything in lua? Replacing a C++ parser with Lua one opens a can of worms in the sense of thinking about which can and which cannot. 3. Kaitai Struct may be helpful if you wanna write a parser in lua (or in C++, JS, or Rust). Disclaimer: I'm involved into this project. Parsers generated by it are considered to be memory safe (in the sense they are gejerated au6omatically, not handcodedby humans, but I am not very sure in it since I don't remember any audit, I feel like integer overflows can be the main source of memory unsafety). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-755709738___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)
@DemiMari, is there any reason to use your lib instead of sequoia? >We can always detect at compile-time if the Rust library is available, and >fall back to the built-in parser if it is not. In runtime. By creating an abstraction layer, detecting the available libs and then prioritizing more secure OpenPGP impls over less secure. I have something like that for python (but curently it doesn't prioritize). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-751317806___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 2174e5386a289355201aa60c43d767d1e244a3ab Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/4b26cf1bbfc9fbcdea7c6e4ac7d6b06c9b496d48..2174e5386a289355201aa60c43d767d1e244a3ab ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 4abe3c7796da4c96ccb24d3c31f849cfa86e4e79 Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/c63584817f594e40e02bb31452906ab676456a36..4abe3c7796da4c96ccb24d3c31f849cfa86e4e79 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 4b26cf1bbfc9fbcdea7c6e4ac7d6b06c9b496d48 Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/278fec730baf775462391e74f71057c8eb8128ec..4b26cf1bbfc9fbcdea7c6e4ac7d6b06c9b496d48 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. c63584817f594e40e02bb31452906ab676456a36 Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/75f8d5dbeef1f95e9a069092945fbc4c6fc01a0f..c63584817f594e40e02bb31452906ab676456a36 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 278fec730baf775462391e74f71057c8eb8128ec Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/4aaacf8e0c7831d5f91054554c87c4473431afa0..278fec730baf775462391e74f71057c8eb8128ec ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 75f8d5dbeef1f95e9a069092945fbc4c6fc01a0f Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/b6d604758b295ef8cb6b8c18c44f1d4bd7be1654..75f8d5dbeef1f95e9a069092945fbc4c6fc01a0f ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 702e756046855d51541c0cf59541cd0a02120e3e Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/ab8a88455919c191ab85bf5a4a3ab8261679185b..702e756046855d51541c0cf59541cd0a02120e3e ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. f7fd783f8146f1e151296ba3659355dcb9943bcb Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/090ad798d700b4f166f19ec55e8120e0716e606d..f7fd783f8146f1e151296ba3659355dcb9943bcb ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
So we can't declutter and eliminate the duplication. IMHO it makes no sense to make the cluttered enums into python enums because they are a bit faster, so the dev can decide what he needs more, convenience to debug or performance and can switch between them by using the appropriate ctors if needed. That's why I haven't converted the APIs implemented in python and returning the ints belonging to the enums. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309#issuecomment-669029978___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
1 Is there any reason to define the enums in C code instead of Python? 2 Should I move them into a python file and replace by pythonic enums then, breaking the compatibility in order to declutter the namespace? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309#issuecomment-669007632___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
1. What clutters the namespace is the enums values generated by swig, because they are not really python enums and they are not namespaced. IDK if we can just break compatibility and get rid of them. The proposed solution is to setup swig to place them into a separate module (is it possible?), and then import that module and convert it, and not explicitly expose it. 2. in some places, where we don't directly interface the cext, we can, by just wrapping the returned values into the enum ctor -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309#issuecomment-668671569___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved errors handling. (#1305)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 17019255f7460814ab5b0a410eb4409c3e43459f Improved errors handling. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1305/files/cca2767a41acb918828504ad03c5bdbbe64f639a..17019255f7460814ab5b0a410eb4409c3e43459f ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. ab8a88455919c191ab85bf5a4a3ab8261679185b Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581..ab8a88455919c191ab85bf5a4a3ab8261679185b ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 090ad798d700b4f166f19ec55e8120e0716e606d Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/b8ccc7cbbfce9c0005b8039aee4a7ec7c4d44cc8..090ad798d700b4f166f19ec55e8120e0716e606d ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. b8ccc7cbbfce9c0005b8039aee4a7ec7c4d44cc8 Added a high-level wrapper. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311/files/8082ede9cc7222686f8466440b0d4c3df62fb45c..b8ccc7cbbfce9c0005b8039aee4a7ec7c4d44cc8 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
@pmatilai @Conan-Kudo @ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311#issuecomment-657635032___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581 Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309/files/41310c6ffda99386b1e7f8354ebb542ffc310317..ce5514692e86b1f556e96494882189405f8a5581 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Added a high-level wrapper. (#1311)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311 -- Commit Summary -- * Added a high-level wrapper. -- File Changes -- A python/rpm/highLevel.py (38) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1311 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)
Thank you. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310#issuecomment-656726988___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)
Supporting signatures (being able to read and process them) and non breaking in their presence, by just ignoring them, are very different things. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306#issuecomment-656706547___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] How to unpack an rpm file into a dir using librpm python bindings? (#1310)
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1310___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. (#1309)
Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. ```python import rpm print(rpm.RPMBuild.CHECK | rpm.RPMBuild.CLEAN) # RPMBuild.CLEAN|CHECK: 24 print(rpm.RPMBuild(24)) # RPMBuild.CLEAN|CHECK: 24 ``` You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309 -- Commit Summary -- * Improved python support: enums are now enums with all additional goodies. Can usually be available using CamelCased prefix, class members have the prefix stripped. -- File Changes -- M python/rpm/__init__.py (2) A python/rpm/rpmEnum.py (77) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1309 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] librpm and its python bindings should give enough messages in order to debug problems in a black box fashion (#1307)
librpm has very bad error messages implementation. It is really hard to determine what is going wrong. It should have more debug messags calls in strategical points - at least before every branch leading to returning failure. error reporting in python bindings should be fixed too -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1307___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Cannot import a GPG key with signatures (#1306)
Damn. I have wasted a lot of time today because of librpm almost silently jas
refused to import a key.
Reproducer:
1. use #1305 to get the more detailed error message than just -1 on later stage
(when the key is added)
2.
```python
import requests
import rpm
suseKeyResp =
requests.get("https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get=0x22C07BA534178CD02EFE22AAB88B2FD43DBDC284;)
suseKey = suseKeyResp.content
rpmKey = rpm.pubkey(suseKey) # The parsing has not consumed the whole stream:
pos = 7372, remaining = 5248
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1306___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improved errors handling. (#1305)
I was really hard to get that that I cannot import a key is just a bug in librpm and its python bindings. This PR makes it a bit more clear. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1305 -- Commit Summary -- * Improved errors handling. -- File Changes -- M python/rpmkeyring-py.c (2) M rpmio/rpmpgp.c (11) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1305.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1305.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1305 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE (#985)
Thanks. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985#issuecomment-574158812___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
Thanks for merging it :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#issuecomment-574159110___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 9987dd701e3351e7e6304f7753fb6d6f0a7484e9 /scripts/check-rpaths: Do not use bashism. (DebBug:772404) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984/files/6be64508deb6f79f9daa82f316e2fd13fac725f1..9987dd701e3351e7e6304f7753fb6d6f0a7484e9 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 6be64508deb6f79f9daa82f316e2fd13fac725f1 /scripts/check-rpaths: Do not use bashism. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984/files/17645a87842f6f478d01bebf1c0c1e827e8db4c6..6be64508deb6f79f9daa82f316e2fd13fac725f1 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream Debian patches: Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of generating temporary files. (#987)
>Also it'd be good to have the original author mentioned - surely Debian has >package change history available somewhere? It is stored in [the form of the patch](https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/tempfile.patch) in which it is written >Description: Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of generating >temporary files >Author: Unknown This metadata tags were added in https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/commit/9bc82bea6dc2af7f07c7dd5044d8cbe0c4ab4a2e#591d515b5331531e8f14b02280b3cb48e2bb72d2 by @nijel. That file was introduced in https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/commit/bb4e4de86405c3d1fb77c53a71c4fc84f6f83d48#7925069534c3fb9b5bf5c78b20291c070694a2da by @lool then the description was added in https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/commit/5c1b5e3a67e2170c9e0898a16ccf57a4f4f9bac8#4c9800bfef626d61e9bd3915cec97b4e42ad0224 by `Anand Kumria` (`wildf...@progsoc.org`, `wildf...@progsoc.uts.edu.au`, I haven't found any recent activity on GH by him, there are plenty of Anands Kumria on GitHub). Should we attribute the patch to him? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987#issuecomment-570182748___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE (#985)
>I think this desserves some better commit message I have just preserved the message present in the patch. BTW, it LGTM. How do you propose to change it? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985#issuecomment-569055577___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
>it'll be a dead link if this is merged. There is a backup on WebArchive now. We all know that if we see a dead link we should check WebArchive for it :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#issuecomment-569055065___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE (#985)
@KOLANICH pushed 1 commit. 9ca1ac7b62bede14906359e3cd07a8d9069df29f Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985/files/152f3326ba895264da10e0904eaa529e59be77eb..9ca1ac7b62bede14906359e3cd07a8d9069df29f ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
@KOLANICH pushed 3 commits. 4c7323f69b4fddf928245e9db2d1c9ca9b277ef2 Fix building with no BerkeleyDB support 166c6c5a1e066bd485f3be98feb5935b1b050f3a Move db_descr assignment from rpmdb to dbi 17645a87842f6f478d01bebf1c0c1e827e8db4c6 Do not use bashism for gettext -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984/files/3c297794a53a5a4a3cc13b183ad0323b830c7df9..17645a87842f6f478d01bebf1c0c1e827e8db4c6 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream Debian patches: Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of generating temporary files. (#987)
I am not the original author of the patch (and also in the patch metadata it is written that the author is unknown, but the maintainer says he doesn't remember any contributions whose author is unknown, the most likely the patch should be also attributed to him) but I guess that `tempfile` deals with the case when the file already exists. IDK though if `tempfile` is available in fedora. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987#issuecomment-568808057___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Delete some crap after running autogen. (#986)
Closed #986. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986#event-2907357914___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream Debian patches: warning about non-native package manager (#989)
Closed #989. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989#event-2907356880___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
Even though the commit message looks like this (it have been inherited from the patch file) I don't see this patch removing any calls. I can guess that the most of the patch got missing (already merged?) but the text haven't been changed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984#issuecomment-568807431___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Verbose installplatform Just make installplatform to ease debugging problems with creatin platform files. (#988)
Closed #988. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988#event-2907351343___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream Debian patches: (#989)
In Debian, rpm should be used to install packages, but rather as a tool to work with rpm packages or as a helper in alien. Because of this we protect complain, when user tries to install a package. This warning can be hidden by --force-debian. Forwarded: http://rpm.org/ticket/79 https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/debian-disable-rpm.patch Should I change the text to be suitable to other distros or you dont need the patches having nothing to do with fedora at all? You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989 -- Commit Summary -- * RPM is not default package manager on Debian -- File Changes -- M configure.ac (2) M lib/poptI.c (5) M lib/rpmprob.h (1) M rpm.c (8) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/989 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Verbose installplatform Just make installplatform to ease debugging problems with creatin platform files. (#988)
… https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/installplatform-verbose.patch You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988 -- Commit Summary -- * Verbose installplatform Just make installplatform to ease debugging problems with creatin platform files. -- File Changes -- M installplatform (1) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/988 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream Debian patches: Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of generating temporary files. (#987)
From: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/tempfile.patch You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987 -- Commit Summary -- * Use the Debian standard (and safe) mechanism of generating temporary files. -- File Changes -- M scripts/vpkg-provides.sh (24) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/987 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Delete some crap after running autogen. (#986)
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/autogen-cleanup.patch You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986 -- Commit Summary -- * Delete some crap after running autogen. -- File Changes -- M autogen.sh (24) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/986 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE (#985)
https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/map-populate.patch You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985 -- Commit Summary -- * Fix compilation on platforms without MAP_POPULATE -- File Changes -- M tools/sepdebugcrcfix.c (6) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/985 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Trying to upstream debian patches: Do not use bashism for gettext (#984)
There are no translations anyway... https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-rpm-team/rpm/raw/master/debian/patches/bashism.patch You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984 -- Commit Summary -- * Do not use bashism for gettext -- File Changes -- M scripts/check-rpaths (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984.patch https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/984 ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Closed #888. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#event-2702699440___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
Thanks, it really fixes this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-540578117___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
@mlschroe, thanks. But the fix doesn't work. I don't mean that the patch cannot be applied, I have applied it manually. I mean I still get the same error. 1. if the conditional is present, `-I/usr/include/lua5.3` is not added into the makefile 2. I have removed the conditional. Even though the makefile contains `-I/usr/include/lua5.3` I still get the error. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-539470535___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
>Where's lauxlib.h on the system? My crystal ball seems broken today. ```bash pkg-config --cflags-only-I lua5.3 -I/usr/include/lua5.3 ls -l /usr/include/lua5.3 total 60 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8432 Nov 23 2015 lauxlib.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14833 May 30 2016 lua.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 191 Dec 23 2004 lua.hpp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21503 Apr 8 2019 luaconf.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1173 Feb 6 2014 lualib.h ``` As I have said, I have replaced `lua` with `lua5.3` in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/configure.ac#L968 . -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888#issuecomment-539428399___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Get rid of automake in favour of CMake or meson (#887)
Because noone likes autotools. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/887#issuecomment-539030483___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory (#888)
``` depbase=`echo parsePreamble.lo | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.lo$||'`;\ /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I.. -I../include/ -I../misc -D_REENTRANT -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector -Wempty-body -fopenmp -g -O2 -MT parsePreamble.lo -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o parsePreamble.lo parsePreamble.c &&\ mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Plo libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -I.. -I../include/ -I../misc -D_REENTRANT -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fstack-protector -Wempty-body -fopenmp -g -O2 -MT parsePreamble.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/parsePreamble.Tpo -c parsePreamble.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/parsePreamble.o In file included from parsePreamble.c:15: ../rpmio/rpmlua.h:5:10: fatal error: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory ` The distro is Ubuntu eoan, liblua5.3-dev is installed, `configure.ac` was modified to find it using pkg-config. The configure flags are: "--with-lua". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/888___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Get rid of automake in favour of CMake or meson (#887)
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/887___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
