`static int matches` from `rpmfc.c` implies that rpm provides & requires
generators only run when either `__NAME_magic` or `__NAME_path` is set:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/3ad98187cc64a88d2d31d181d10bef5eef6274b7/build/rpmfc.c#L794
Yet, the documentation
https://rpm-sof
> I'd imagine a parametric generator in Lua would work nicely for this
> :thinking:
I must confess that I have absolutely no experience with these, so I'm
afraid I won't be of much help with that.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directl
@dcermak pushed 1 commit.
bcbfcc5489ee821d16735576e0511e671363051e Add a rpm_macro() provides generator
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1758/files/bcfe13bb0becaf76cf37f7d7f3113641399692a
This commit adds a very simple provides generator for rpm macros as suggested
on the Fedora packaging mailing list:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DUFER7QAFYIBYDANJQQ37FBNL5YISZQ2/
cc @hroncok @Conan-Kudo
You can view, comment on, or merge
At the moment rpm will load keys from a pre-defined directory
(`%{_keyringpath}`) and **only** if no keys are found there, will it try to
load keys from the rpmdb:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/1efe530450b5bdbd90128327be56c87fa1b6843b/lib/rpmts.c#L382
This is a bit unfortu
This looks intriguing!
Do I understand it correctly that you'd essentially do a `my_spec_generator >
%_builddir/__rpm/subpac.spec` which would e.g. contain a new subpackage
definition?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it
cc: @scarabeusiv @darix @coolo This could be relevant for subpackage generation
for Ruby and Python in openSUSE/SLE.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/329#i