Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Add ability to run lua scripts directly (#1273)
Thanks @hroncok -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1273#issuecomment-813533730___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Add ability to run lua scripts directly (#1273)
Bump. We sure would like to make progress on this so that rpm-ostree can start supporting lua appropriately and not asking packagers to rewrite their scriptlets. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1273#issuecomment-650429825___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] regression: specifying "%_gpg_name First Last <em...@fool.com>" does not work (#120)
Agreed, I'll let you know if I see the problem again. Thanks -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/120#issuecomment-276655231___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] regression: specifying "%_gpg_name First Last <em...@fool.com>" does not work (#120)
hey @pmatilai - i'm using fedora 24 with: ``` $ rpm -q rpm rpm-sign gnupg2 gnupg rpm-4.13.0-1.fc24.x86_64 rpm-sign-4.13.0-1.fc24.x86_64 gnupg2-2.1.13-2.fc24.x86_64 gnupg-1.4.21-1.fc24.x86_64 ``` my DISPLAY variable is unset but my `TERM` is `screen-256color`. What is odd that I am trying to reproduce today in the very same terminal that I was having the problem in the other day (I can see the output in the scrollback) and the "in terminal" text based popup is now coming up and asking me for my password. I'm not sure what the problem is/was. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/120#issuecomment-271880706___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] regression: specifying "%_gpg_name First Last em...@fool.com" does not work (#120)
In the example shown [here](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/1ce844ab263bf49ee6d5145ed09e73f2c17924cc/doc/rpmsign.8#L67) I should be able to specify a macro of `%_gpg_name Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com>` and be able to use that. Unfortunately, i get this error instead: ``` $ rpm --addsign ./grub2-2.02-0.38.fc25.dusty.x86_64.rpm ./grub2-2.02-0.38.fc25.dusty.x86_64.rpm: gpg: signing failed: Line passed to IPC too long gpg: signing failed: Line passed to IPC too long error: gpg exec failed (2) ``` I don't think this is a doc bug because I see other examples around the internet where this format is used. One of them is [here](https://blog.packagecloud.io/eng/2014/11/24/howto-gpg-sign-verify-rpm-packages-yum-repositories/) where the person uses `%_gpg_name Alicia Gonzalez <agonza...@packagecloud.io>`. So it looks like a regression where this used to work. Note that if I use `Dusty Mabe` or `du...@dustymabe.com` it works fine. So it looks like the "handoff" to gpg might just need some fixing up? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/120___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
