Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Migrate away from Zanata (#1131)

2020-03-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste
It make sense. Here are some information to help you to make your choice.

Using Fedora instance only requires user to have a FAS account. No complex 
workflows or approval of any kind.

Benefits I see is consistency with ecosystem (mostly RPM). And have a 
structured community to interact with.

We are consistent with Fedora values: we translate upstream content, and not 
what is specific to Fedora.

We do host projects outside of Fedora perimeter. Just part of the Linux 
ecosystem (such as pulseaudio).

If translate.fedoraproject.org isn't your choice, hosted.weblate.org may also 
host you if you ask them.

Just ping me if you need advices in your migration (wherever you go).


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1131#issuecomment-603180769___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint


Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Migrate away from Zanata (#1131)

2020-03-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste
Of course, but most of the job you can do yourself.
@m-blaha : can you please apply the same of what you did for dnf?
I'm unsure you need any help from me now that you did it for four components.

could you please discuss together the full list of project that can be 
translated in rpm-software-management group? ;)
All of them are welcome, there is no limit.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1131#issuecomment-602868387___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint