Merged #1265 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1265#event-3428649150___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-mai
Looks good. In my mind the prefix search is also bound to the index iteration.
Probably because this is how it was introduced on bdb.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management
Seems to fix my problem :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1265#issuecomment-641855601___
Rpm-maint mailing list
The prefix search was so wrong it's a small miracle it ever did anything
at all. What have I been thinking? Well, I do remember thinking this
prefix stuff looks kinda fishy but then it seems to work so...
The prefix search belongs to the keyed iterator fetch case of course,
not the case where we'r
