Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OrderWithRequires dependency generation (32e2bc5)
Yes, sure. This is a dependency as all the others and does support the same features. The only difference is that OrderWithRequires is ignored during the dependency check and only used for ordering. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/32e2bc50cff9db05729349ff6645a0251d5719fb#commitcomment-39776284___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OrderWithRequires dependency generation (32e2bc5)
Does this mean that constructions like "OrderWithRequires: >= VERSION" are supported? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/32e2bc50cff9db05729349ff6645a0251d5719fb#commitcomment-39775833___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OrderWithRequires dependency generation (32e2bc5)
*sigh* Fixed in #1263 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/32e2bc50cff9db05729349ff6645a0251d5719fb#commitcomment-39775202___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add OrderWithRequires dependency generation (32e2bc5)
@ffesti I see that you added "RPMTAG_ORDERNAME, RPMTAG_ORDERVERSION, RPMTAG_ORDERFLAGS," ( https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1262/files#diff-ddf4f9f570183f31f3d5ba0a715a954fR1406 ), but I added "RPMTAG_ORDERNAME, RPMTAG_ORDERFLAGS,". I actually did not test %__find_orderwithrequires because I am not sure how it should work, probably off the internal dependency generator and define this macro? Which variant is correct? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/32e2bc50cff9db05729349ff6645a0251d5719fb#commitcomment-39774778___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
