@Conan-Kudo Fair enough. Could you please open an issue for that? And perhaps
include additional details, preferably a use case that you encountered in the
past that would be easier with this feature?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
@dmnks, @pmatilai: I'm the maintainer of `debbuild` these days, and I am
interested in seeing if we can make this a reality in `rpmbuild`.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hmm, okay. If @ascherer no longer cares and I don't seem to get this done
despite promising to do so... maybe we'll just close this then. Thanks for your
work on this @ascherer anyway!
@dmnks , if you want to have a go at the generic progname_flags thing, feel
free but open a new PR for that
Closed #557.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/557#event-2992398932___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@ascherer Thanks for the fast reply!
@pmatilai Do we want to pursue this change in the long run (and thus should
keep it open)?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I've transfered ownership of `debbuild` after running out of ideas for that
tool, so `rpmbuild` is of even less interest to me. Feel free to close this PR
or elaborate on it as you deem appropriate.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
In an attempt to revive this work:
I think what @pmatilai meant to suggest above was to allow for a generic way to
pass arguments to programs invoked as part of the %setup macro, as opposed to
handling each extractor (and the respective macro) separately. The pending
patch does the latter and
While looking at this, it became obvious there are more changes here than just
the added flags.
The first part pushed as 76c429c3178c965c6517629957a633768132904c, I'll handle
the rest as time permits, so feel free to ignore the conflicts etc.
--
You are receiving this because you are
Done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/557#issuecomment-426715690___
Rpm-maint mailing list
