Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
Ended up bumping it to 3.18 after running into enough more or less minor but nice stuff. That's as far as it can go though. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248#discussioncomment-5541159 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
I used 3.12 for popt because that's the minimum version with helper functions for easily creating the cmake config/version files for `find_package()`. I'm fine with this as the minimum for rpm too. (I was going to bump it anyway when I synced my improvements from popt into rpm ) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248#discussioncomment-4583700 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
Debian isn't exactly a prime target for rpm :smile: but for the record, it seems to be at 3.18.4 from 2020, which is probably newer than rpm can reasonably require. So that should be easily covered. In the meanwhile I realized rpm is already relying on at least >= 3.12 despite what our CMakeLists.txt (for deitys sake who came up with that filename...) claims. 3.12 is from 2018 and that may be more like it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248#discussioncomment-4017595 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
Speaking with my [CBL-Mariner](https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner) distro maintainer hat on- no objections to having a floor of cmake 3.20. The lowest version of cmake we support in Mariner at this time is 3.21.4. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248#discussioncomment-3975727 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
It should be possible to build on Debian stable. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248#discussioncomment-3967934 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] cmake minimum version requirement for rpm? (Discussion #2248)
As we're moving to cmake in the next major release, here's a bit of a community poll: what would be a reasonable minimum version to require? Rpm is conservative in its requirements so it's not like we'd require a cmake from last week or even last year, but AIUI cmake is very different from autotools in that things are not expected to break left and right when you update. I initially tossed in version 3.10 as minimum as there were some important looking changes around that time, but it's starting to seem long in the tooth and overly conservative. Buildability on latest RHEL is one of our unwritten requirements, but RHEL 9 and even 8 have cmake 3.20 already. Thoughts from those more familiar with the cmake ecosystem, from other distros perspective etc? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2248 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
