On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 09:47 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are a number of other places as well where bitfield is used:
tsflags, vsflags, verifyflags (once the verification api gets done) etc,
if something is to be done about them I think it should
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 09:47 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
There are a number of other places as well where bitfield is used:
tsflags, vsflags, verifyflags (once the verification api gets done) etc,
if something is to be done about them I think it should be a generic
bitfield wrapper object
Would it be possible in some future rpm python interface to get rid of
the horrible setVsFLAGS bitmask and just have the items be attributes
you set or unset in the ts object?
ts = rpm.TransactionSet()
ts.gpgcheck = False
ts.hdrcheck = True
ts.installroot = '/some/place'
etc. etc
I know 'being
