@ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> +parser.add_argument('-P', '--provides', action='store_true', help='Print
> Provides')
+parser.add_argument('-R', '--requires', action='store_true', help='Print
Requires')
+parser.add_argument('-r', '--recommends', action='store_true',
@s-t-e-v-e-n-k pushed 1 commit.
0afbfbb67b8b5d8346271a7d8d2351ad4ed0f411 scripts/pythondistdeps: Switch to
argparse
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@s-t-e-v-e-n-k commented on this pull request.
> +parser.add_argument('-P', '--provides', action='store_true', help='Print
> Provides')
+parser.add_argument('-R', '--requires', action='store_true', help='Print
Requires')
+parser.add_argument('-r', '--recommends', action='store_true',
@ignatenkobrain commented on this pull request.
> +parser.add_argument('-P', '--provides', action='store_true', help='Print
> Provides')
+parser.add_argument('-R', '--requires', action='store_true', help='Print
Requires')
+parser.add_argument('-r', '--recommends', action='store_true',
OTOH maybe we'll just go with this one for now, it has the benefit of being
applicable to 4.15 too...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
Someone finally did something that has been on my TODO for me.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
The NSS library often changes in ways that somehow breaks rpm,
and these days upstream does not care about consumers of NSS other
than itself. This inflicts untold amounts of suffering on users
of rpm in distributions where rpm is linked to NSS.
Now that we have a couple of good, well-supported
This very much breaks my pull request I'm preparing — it seems that once you
start working on pythondistdeps, everyone gets notification about it and starts
working on it too :) — but it's beautiful and I'm all for it!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply
Closed #1175 via #1182.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1175#event-3239767503___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Merged #1182 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1182#event-3239767498___
Rpm-maint mailing list
@pmatilai approved this pull request.
Fine by me.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
While on the subject - are all those added empty lines due to some flake8
warnings?
I like visual aides as much as the next guy, but I do disagree with wasting
perfectly good screen estate with two consecutive empty lines when one will do
the trick already :grin:
--
You are receiving this
Nice, but please don't mix whitespace changes with code changes.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Splitting to a separate commit would be great, no need to make a separate PR
though.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Yeah, %define with options is what I'd really like (I think I even mentioned
somewhere surrounding the pending %literal).
In macro files the name limitation could be abused for similar effect by adding
special characters in the front of the name. AIUI rpm5 used "." to denote a
read-only
Would you like me to revert that part of the change? They are fairly
self-contained, so easy enough to pull out in a separate change.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Yes, flake8 warns on needing two blank lines, not one.
https://www.flake8rules.com/rules/E302.html
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Right, so it's an [upstream Python
guideline](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#blank-lines) that I wasn't
even aware of. I'll just agree to disagree with that then, so nevermind :smile:
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly
Be my guest...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1175#issuecomment-614530275___
Rpm-maint mailing list
19 matches
Mail list logo
