Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RPM fsverity support (#1203)

2020-06-01 Thread Panu Matilainen
Ok, good. For now I think we need to concentrate on the fundamental problem of architecture dependency. While most architectures today use 4K pages, being common doesn't make it arch independent, and then there are architectures where this is configurable (eg aarch64). A noarch package cannot

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Generators for license (#1073)

2020-06-01 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
My 2 cents if you start listing several licenses in the spec license field would be to consider using SPDX license expressions -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild: Create build tree after parsing a spec file (#1235)

2020-06-01 Thread Panu Matilainen
I'm getting this on Fedora 32: > rpmbuild.c: In function ‘getTarSpec’: rpmbuild.c:342:22: error: unused variable ‘res’ [-Werror=unused-variable] 342 | int gotspec = 0, res; | ^~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors Other than that, looks good I think. --

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild: Create build tree after parsing a spec file (#1235)

2020-06-01 Thread Igor Raits
@pmatilai fixed and rebased. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1235#issuecomment-636714949___ Rpm-maint mailing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild: Create build tree after parsing a spec file (#1235)

2020-06-01 Thread Panu Matilainen
Merged #1235 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1235#event-3392226804___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpmbuild: Create build tree after parsing a spec file (#1235)

2020-06-01 Thread Panu Matilainen
Thanks for the patches! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1235#issuecomment-636722464___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Generators for license (#1073)

2020-06-01 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
@pombredanne Convince @spotrh for Fedora, here it doesn't really matter. If a distro uses SPDX, then it'll use that, otherwise it'll use whatever standard they've been using. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks pushed 2 commits. 88d650776bfc93bf4fd863a7081aeb889bd04bf1 GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing a58d462040774da53f91d8388b3bdd0b86916c25 GPG: refactor: exit label -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Stop blocking when GPG process dies prematurely (RhBug:1746353) (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks pushed 2 commits. f1df9c9bd2f7e9955932a63930c008e97440c9e8 GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing 285d1823ca30f4a19bf7058b248d2dfba428a11b GPG: refactor: exit label -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks pushed 2 commits. 838c9c6dbdc974563e4f8d7301638991ed247950 GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing 927790f8808488626993f33c88d97ca1755d4c3d GPG: refactor: exit label -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks pushed 2 commits. ab87b1ef439f7bc74302cf4e36720711d2ae93f5 GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing 940b93a130654f4d7bb0a94cacda395c26d7c7e2 GPG: refactor: exit label -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] GPG: Switch back to pipe(7) for signing (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks pushed 1 commit. 2d0b1f6c07dce3885d7d2761c6e1c98aa22b83b0 GPG: refactor: exit label -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. View it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Stop blocking when GPG process dies prematurely (RhBug:1746353) (#938)

2020-06-01 Thread Michal Domonkos
@dmnks commented on this pull request. > if (fnamedPipe) Fclose(fnamedPipe); -if (pid) - waitpid(pid, , 0); +if (gpgPid) + waitpid(gpgPid, , 0); Hopefully resolved in the second commit :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this

[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] macros: force add files to git index (#1246)

2020-06-01 Thread Xiaofeng Wang
Its rarely the case that the user may set global ``core.excludesfile``, ``git add .`` may not add all the files as expect. It will fail to build if the excluded files are patch-needed. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: