I'm having some trouble parsing the description of what happened. But if files
suddenly getting classified as python based on magic where they were not before
sounds more like a libmagic change than rpm one.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this ema
> sounds more like a libmagic change than rpm one.
Let me test that actually.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1272#issuecomment-645949664___
Indeed! This makes much more sense now, thanks. I'll amend the commit message.
Before (file-5.38-6.fc33):
```
sh-5.0# file -z -e tokens
/opt/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/{__pycache__/,}file*
/opt/usr/lib/python3.8/site-packages/__pycache__/file.cpython-38.opt-1.pyc: data
/opt/usr/lib/python3
Commit message amended.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1272#issuecomment-645958035___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm
Actually, this is subset of [Automatic (sub)package
generators](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/329) and an
extension to https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/310.
However, creating this to have contained discussions.
Currently most of the RPM packaged appli
Ahh yup, that looks promising. @pmatilai You mentioned in [this
comment](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1215#issuecomment-628594473)
that it's not considered public API. Would you be open to exposing them
through a CLI switch for now? We could mark it experimental/hidden t
Would you accept a pull request that that adds a `rpmlua` executable and makes
it behave more or less like my Python script?
Note that my C skills are rusty and my autotools skills are almost nonexistent,
so I will probably need some guidance.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscrib
1. as mentioned at that bug, not sure if it's fortunate to mention something
(`build-id` concept) that cannot be properly referenced, e.g. to
`rpmbuild(8)`
(closest is `tests/rpmbuild.at`: `build-id files should link to the .debug
files`),
perhaps more generic explanation would suffice,
