Since there's no feedback...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1373#issuecomment-701223204___
Rpm-maint mailing
Merged #1367 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1367#event-3823122541___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Since there have been no further comments...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1367#issuecomment-701222875___
This turned out to be a much bigger release than anticipated with
several groundbreaking new features, despite finally being back to
annual cycle almost to date. After a whopping six month testing period,
here goes!
Highlights include:
* Database backends:
* NDB backend promoted to
Merged #1373 into rpm-4.16.x.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1373#event-3823124917___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Reopening for tracking in file trigger spec revise (whenever that will happen)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hmm, that seems strange. I get that with zypp doing multiple smaller
transactions (IIRC), the transaction triggers would execute more often than
just once, but since there will inevitably be far fewer partial transactions
than packages, it'd still seem beneficial to do the expensive cache
Reopened #386.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/386#event-3823454237___
Rpm-maint mailing list
zypper calls the rpm command. So a new transaction for each package..
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
s/zypper/zypp/
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1370#issuecomment-701263659___
Rpm-maint mailing list
We should add support for Lua script plugin API, loosely modeled around our C
API. Not everything can be done from Lua, but then not everything needs to be
in C either. This would lower the bar to implementing plugins in the right
layer (as opposed to eg dnf) greatly and open up all sorts of
Fixes compilation on musl, otherwise it fails with undefined references
to various O_* symbols as mentioned here:
https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man0/fcntl.h.0p.html
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1379
The existing rpm.next_file() Lua API should only be present inside file
triggers, not in the global API.
Also there shouldn't be need for such a special call at all, it could be
handled (maybe with override) using io.read() to be closer to regular
scriptlets, but next_file() needs to stay for
Closed #1018.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1018#event-3824156523___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Closing to avoid anybody thinking that %'s can't be handled. Optimizations oare
a whole different matter.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
You can execute arbitrary Lua with rpmExpand() or --eval with a %{lua:...}
macro as it is. But the actual scriptlet running machinery needs all manner of
context that only exists inside transactions.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1376#pullrequestreview-499577267___
@Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1379#pullrequestreview-499576494___
18 matches
Mail list logo
