Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-23 Thread Fabian Vogt
Thanks for the quick fix! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1278#issuecomment-648050421___ Rpm-maint mailing

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-23 Thread Panu Matilainen
Thanks for reporting and the nice reproducer! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1278#issuecomment-648046616___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-23 Thread Panu Matilainen
Closed #1278 via #1279. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1278#event-3472164919___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Panu Matilainen
Ah... makes sense. Thanks for spotting that! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1278#issuecomment-647465328___

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Fabian Vogt
Just found out that this only happens with `%_minimize_writes` enabled, as otherwise even unchanged files are recreated correctly as hardlinks. ``` D: create 100644 2 ( 0, 0) 0 /usr/file1;5ef086f0 D: touch 100644 2 ( 0, 0) 8 /usr/file2 ``` vs. ``` D: create 100644

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Panu Matilainen
Ok, thanks for verifying. Just FWIW, --oldpackage is the "appropriate" flag for downgrades, --force is the BFH usually best left in the toolshed :grin: -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Fabian Vogt
I ran the commands again without `--force` and edited the post accordingly. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Fabian Vogt
Yes. I only used `--force` so that I can use the same commands for install, upgrade and downgrade. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Package upgrades break if hardlinks got added (#1278)

2020-06-22 Thread Panu Matilainen
With --force, if something breaks you get to keep the pieces. Is it reproducable without --force? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: