> A spec will no longer be a spec if such a feature was added. I can see how
> templating can be useful, but I think this would need to be thought of as a
> different file type - say, `.spec.in` rather than `.spec` to make it clear.
I think it's mostly matter of preference and compatibility.
A spec will no longer be a spec if such a feature was added. I can see how
templating can be useful, but I think this would need to be thought of as a
different file type - say, `.spec.in` rather than `.spec` to make it clear.
Also just noting that #1241 is related, there's an increasing amount
Hello,
since this change https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2532 will not likely be
accepted, I would like to ask if you were willing to accept a pull request to
enable spec file preprocessing directly on rpm level. It would add a third type
of macro (except `%{}` and `%()`), which would work
