Dne 1.11.2016 v 10:26 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
> On 1 November 2016 at 09:01, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 1.11.2016 v 09:08 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
>>> On 1 November 2016 at 07:53, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 1.11.2016 v 00:04 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
> One big problem with having the gem
Dne 1.11.2016 v 09:08 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
> On 1 November 2016 at 07:53, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 1.11.2016 v 00:04 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
>>> One big problem with having the gemspec in the parent directory is
>>> that we can't easily apply patches to it.
>> You are right. Never thoug
Dne 1.11.2016 v 00:04 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
>
> One big problem with having the gemspec in the parent directory is
> that we can't easily apply patches to it.
You are right. Never thought about it. But I would not call it "big"
problem ;)
> This is a problem for about a dozen packages with i
On 19 October 2016 at 13:24, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>>> As it turns out, there's at least one other difference which breaks
>>> build for us:
>>> eg for ruby-gemcutter
>>> (http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/ruby-gemcutter/current/SPECS/ruby-gemcutter.spec?revision=947391&vie
On 19 October 2016 at 15:30, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> On 19 October 2016 at 13:24, Pascal Terjan wrote:
As it turns out, there's at least one other difference which breaks
build for us:
eg for ruby-gemcutter
(http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/ruby-gemc
Dne 17.10.2016 v 16:34 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
> On 17 October 2016 at 15:12, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:37 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
>>> On 17 October 2016 at 14:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:07 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a):
> On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, V
Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:37 Pascal Terjan napsal(a):
> On 17 October 2016 at 14:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 17.10.2016 v 15:07 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a):
>>> On 17 October 2016 at 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17.10.2016 v 11:30 Thierry Vignaud napsal(a):
> On 17 October 2016 at 10:10,
