Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-12 Thread Florian Festi
Thanks of the effort! -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-246329016___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-12 Thread Florian Festi
Merged #17. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#event-785843506___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-08 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
Looks good to me!  @ffesti What do you think? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-245801457___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-08 Thread proyvind
Done, this should hopefully suffice. :) -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-245781671___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-08 Thread Florian Festi
I'd squash the last 5 patches together and put them on to of the current HEAD if this is ok with you. -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-09-07 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
@ffesti @ignatenkobrain Anyone have a chance to re-review after the rebase? -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-05-28 Thread proyvind
sorry for slooow response, but rebased now :) --- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-222306973___ Rpm-maint mailing list

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-05-28 Thread proyvind
Hm, there's several asserts in place throughout source code that would be bad to compile with -DNDEBUG as the desired and safe behaviour expected for assert is to abort if expession evaluated is false... Of course one could replace the assert(3) with: if(--mt_options.threads == 0) abort();

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Improvements for xz support (#17)

2016-05-13 Thread dnf-bot
Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/17#issuecomment-219041050___ Rpm-maint mailing list