Merged #483.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/483#event-1758666738___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Then it still looks good to me.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/483#issuecomment-408633987___
Rpm-maint
```pycon
$ python2.7
Python 2.7.15 (default, May 16 2018, 17:50:09)
[GCC 8.1.1 20180502 (Red Hat 8.1.1-1)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib
>>> from sys import version
>>>
One has site-packages and zero does not. Yet all standard library is in lib64,
hence this results.
Will check legacy Python as well.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@hroncok Also, how does this affect Python 2?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/483#issuecomment-408633582___
@hroncok This change looks good to me, but I'm actually a bit confused, what's
the difference here between `standard_lib=1` and `standard_lib=0`?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Conan-Kudo approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/483#pullrequestreview-141327101___