> On Apr 1, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:21PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, rpm-maint@!
>>>
>>> There
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 07:50:09AM +0300, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
> > Hello, rpm-maint@!
> >
> > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
> >
> > The main idea is that RPMTAG_IDENTITY
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 03:07:21PM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello, rpm-maint@!
> >
> > There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
> >
> > The main idea is that
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
wrote:
> Hello, rpm-maint@!
>
> There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
>
> The main idea is that RPMTAG_IDENTITY contains a hash of as many as possible,
> ideally all RPMTAGs, with exception
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev
> wrote:
>
> Hello, rpm-maint@!
>
> There are RFC patches which implement RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation.
>
> The main idea is that RPMTAG_IDENTITY contains a hash of as many as possible,
> ideally all RPMTAGs, with