On 10.10.2008 16:40, Julian Sikorski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Job failed on arch i386
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-9-rpmfusion_nonfree/1205-sdlmame-0128-0.7.0127u7.fc9/
[...]
Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot
On 10.10.2008 18:00, Christopher Stone wrote:
Hi, I'm getting the same error. I don't have a .ssh/config file, and
do not know how to make one, but Ive made a new public key and
uploaded it and no matter what I try I keep getting a permission
denied error
$ echo $CVSROOT
:ext:[EMAIL
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
On 10.10.2008 16:40, Julian Sikorski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Job failed on arch i386
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-9-rpmfusion_nonfree/1205-sdlmame-0128-0.7.0127u7.fc9/
[...]
Executing /usr/sbin/mock-helper
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) pisze:
Just with my previous message. I've suggested the need of having the
nvidia beta driver provided from a separate repository.
Actually there are others cases where it would be needed:
-vlc is now at 0.9.x but still has very hard regression (VLM, vlvc,
On 11.10.2008 12:59, KH KH wrote:
2008/10/11 Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11.10.2008 11:15, Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) wrote:
...
people with spare cycles! Like the package with the mock configs for test
building RPM Fusion packages. I heard about ten request for it, but nobody
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 11:15 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) wrote:
- ieee1394 stack is still needed for some driver like
http://www.ffado.org/
I've got a local ffado package that works w/the new stack.
(it may also need compat-libraw1394 unless the
dual stack mode works).
It does, but its
Just with my previous message. I've suggested the need of having the
nvidia beta driver provided from a separate repository.
Actually there are others cases where it would be needed:
-vlc is now at 0.9.x but still has very hard regression (VLM, vlvc,
interaction with dependents software) from
On 11.10.2008 11:15, Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) wrote:
Just with my previous message. I've suggested the need of having the
nvidia beta driver provided from a separate repository.
Actually there are others cases where it would be needed:
-vlc is now at 0.9.x but still has very hard regression
On 09.10.2008 07:07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Xavier Lamien wrote:
I really appreciate the effort and the work done for this spin but
I'd really see a _clear_ discussion about that project before start
host anything (including the name of the future Official RPMFusion
spin).
+1
One other
BTW, some will have noticed already: I was traveling for two days (and
have been a bit busy right before that) and I'm making my way through
the mail backlog...
On 08.10.2008 00:18, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Since I'm new with packaging for a 3rd part repo I need to get
certain things clear.
Note
+1 for all of what you mentioned. We should definitely plan the official
channel of communication for users, maybe a News page on the Wiki?
I don't think it's possible [1] to have a 100% smooth upgrade path for
users,
but this way is the best way to minimize it as much as possible. One thing
On 11.10.2008 09:47, Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) wrote:
With this message I would particularly focus on one problem with the
nVidia driver maintainability via the rpmfusion_nonfree repository.
The new stable nVidia driver 177.80 has dropped support for Geforce
serie 5 (NV3X) cards. This means
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10.10.2008 18:00, Christopher Stone wrote:
PLEASE HELP!
Has this been fixed in between (looks like it from the server logs)? If not
please send output of
ssh -v cvs.rpmfusion.org
to me (optionally to Xavier as
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
We afaics have all the main bits from livna-devel in rpmfusion-devel
now. Thus I'd say it's time to copy the rpmfusion-release packages over
to the livna devel repo and build a new livna-release package with
tracks the rpmfusion-release packages in. That way
Rex Dieter pisze:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
We afaics have all the main bits from livna-devel in rpmfusion-devel
now. Thus I'd say it's time to copy the rpmfusion-release packages
over to the livna devel repo and build a new livna-release package
with tracks the rpmfusion-release
Hi!
When i try to compli nvidia kmod i get this error, Can i do something
to fix it? Also ...where is Xorg in F10??? it's not in /etc/X11.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo /etc/init.d/nvidia reload
Checking for module nvidia.ko: [ OK ]
Enabling the nvidia driver: Traceback
On 11.10.2008 18:22, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Rex Dieter pisze:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
We afaics have all the main bits from livna-devel in rpmfusion-devel
now. Thus I'd say it's time to copy the rpmfusion-release packages
over to the livna devel repo and build a new livna-release package
with
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi!
We afaics have all the main bits from livna-devel in rpmfusion-devel
now. Thus I'd say it's time to copy the rpmfusion-release packages over
to the livna devel repo and build a new livna-release package with
tracks the rpmfusion-release packages in. That way
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
On 11.10.2008 18:22, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Rex Dieter pisze:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
We afaics have all the main bits from livna-devel in rpmfusion-devel
now. Thus I'd say it's time to copy the rpmfusion-release packages
over to the livna devel repo and build a new
--- On Sat, 10/11/08, Mario Chacon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mario Chacon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nvidia drivers problem
To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 12:35 PM
Hi!
When i try to compli nvidia
Thanks for help, but when i run the utility to create the default
xorg.conf and restart the machine y cannot get X interface.
I have nVidia Corporation G71 [GeForce 7950 GT], is it work with the
current Nvidia driver?
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat October 11 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 09.10.2008 07:07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
We have already been discussing the details including the name for a
while in this list.
Please point me to that discussion. As far as I remember and from
searching omega site:lists.rpmfusion.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
