On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
comaintained by Chris Stone, I believe for qmc2 and sdlmame* he should
On 14.10.2008 11:57, Xavier Lamien wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I skimmed through owners.list for my packages and it seems the setup is
not entirely right. Since the packages I maintain in nonfree are also
comaintained by Chris Stone, I
On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a testing
community within rpmfusion
If there is any interest
Hows accessible is wiki?
I can't remember exactly, but I think you can edit if once you
registered (and if not then it
Hi!
just thought I write down a rough list of things that I plan to do for
RPM Fusion over the next couple of weeks. I'm sending it here in the
hope that some people help me with some of those task; then we hopefully
get RPM Fusion running quite soon.
Here is a updated version; most
On 12.10.2008 10:19, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Orcan Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-devel
orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-F-8
orphaned | KmPg2 | Not found in free-F-9
orphaned | mamory | Not found in free-devel
orphaned | mamory | Not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #3 from NicolasChauvet [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-14 21:10:30 ---
SRPM:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/xmltv/xmltv-0.5.53-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm
SPEC:
http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/xmltv/xmltv.spec
Summary: A set of
On 14.10.2008 11:21, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:30:12PM +1100, Marc Bradshaw wrote:
The packaged version uses the same upstream as the debian package. The
deb copyrights file states Everyone is permitted to do anything on this
program including copying, modifying, and
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 05:30:12PM +1100, Marc Bradshaw wrote:
The packaged version uses the same upstream as the debian package. The
deb copyrights file states Everyone is permitted to do anything on this
program including copying, modifying, and improving, unless you try to
pretend
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:49:13 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
* There are entries in owners.list with no bz account.
[...]
This list should be a lot shorter now:
fedora, free:
* entry for libmms is duplicate
* for the following entries the email addr doesn't match with bugzilla:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
James.Bottomley AT hansenpartnership.com
rt2860
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
James.Bottomley AT hansenpartnership.com
rt2860
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I've been thinking if there's any interest in creating a testing
community within rpmfusion
If there is any interest
Hows accessible is wiki?
I can't remember exactly, but I think you can edit if once you
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
James.Bottomley AT hansenpartnership.com
rt2860
On Tuesday, 14 October 2008 at 19:05, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Brought over there from fedora-devel; see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg01408.html
for details.
On 14.10.2008 18:49, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Note, nearly all of livna's
Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:45:09PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
k, so how important do we consider sl? And how fast can the review be
done in Fedora?
Or, IOW: Is the consensus then to not import the package to RPM Fusion,
even if that means that users then
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
- are the nvidia bits sane? There were some mails about the 177series,
but seems some questions were not answered yet
As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong Nicolas), we're dropping 177 for
Livna F-8/9 and focus on the move to RPM Fusion and provide it there
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 22:11 +, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Your following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
On 15.10.2008 00:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2008 at 19:05, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Brought over there from fedora-devel; see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg01408.html
for details.
On 14.10.2008 18:49, Dmitry Butskoy
On 14.10.2008 23:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 14.10.2008 00:05, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
[...]
It would be good if maintainers could create a wiki page with info on
how to get the info they want ( debug output ) and which files (
logfiles etc )
they want
19 matches
Mail list logo
